Escalating Rhetoric of Trump Sheds Light on Potential Future Governance Approach

22

In the past fortnight, Donald Trump has advocated for the immediate execution of shoplifters, proposed the execution of the United States’ highest-ranking military officer, and ridiculed a political rival’s spouse who was assaulted with a hammer. The ex-President and current leading contender for the Republican presidential nomination has concurrently called for the impeachment of Democratic President Joe Biden, lobbied for a government shutdown to derail legal cases against him, and threatened to limit NBC News and MSNBC’s broadcasting capabilities over what he termed as “Country Threatening Treason” in their coverage of him.

From his early days as a New York real estate magnate, Trump has adopted a tough, confrontational tone, particularly concerning crime and retribution against those he perceives as adversaries. However, his recent surge in combative language aligns closely with the draconian measures frequently found in authoritarian governments, a few of which he has praised, such as the regimes of Russian President Vladimir Putin and North Korean leader Kim Jong-Un.

According to Ruth Ben-Ghiat, a historian at New York University and author of the book “Strongmen,” Trump’s platform now seems to focus on the theme of violence. This focus bears resemblance to strongman leaders like former Philippines President Rodrigo Duterte, who oversaw thousands of extrajudicial killings in his anti-drug campaign, and other countries where dissenting military figures mysteriously vanish.

Over nearly a decade, Trump has made a series of provocative and violent statements, often without subsequent action. These remarks have sometimes led to real-world repercussions, as evidenced by the January 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol, spurred by Trump’s unfounded claims about election fraud. Such language has also influenced the Republican Party’s policy direction, incorporating Trump’s personal grudges and whims into their broader agenda.

Recently, after Trump criticized the FBI for political bias, Republican lawmakers have called for the agency’s dissolution and initiated investigations into the federal government’s supposed weaponization against him. Similarly, his mention of bombing drug laboratories in Mexico has led other Republican presidential contenders to propose increasingly belligerent approaches to combating drug cartels south of the border.

The uptick in Trump’s violent and vengeful rhetoric comes as he solidifies his lead in the Republican primary race while concurrently facing mounting legal challenges. Such remarks have not only alarmed political circles but have also led to judicial interventions, including gag orders imposed by judges overseeing his civil and criminal cases.

Though most Republicans have remained silent on Trump’s recent remarks, some like former Vice President Mike Pence have expressed concern. Likewise, Trump’s previous White House Chief of Staff, John Kelly, issued a statement condemning Trump’s attacks on democratic institutions.

Democrats, including President Biden, have cautioned that Trump and his Make America Great Again movement pose a significant risk to American democracy, while others suggest that the muted criticism from his Republican rivals may not be enough to sway voters away from Trump.

In sum, Trump’s increasingly hostile and confrontational rhetoric not only reflects his potential governance style if re-elected but also has far-reaching implications for the party he once led and the nation as a whole.

Contributions to this report were made by Jonathan J. Cooper and Michael R. Blood in Anaheim, California, for Big Big News.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Trump’s Rhetoric

More about Trump’s Rhetoric

• Donald Trump’s Recent Controversial Statements
• Authoritarianism in Trump’s Rhetoric
• Impact of Trump’s Rhetoric on the Republican Party
• Judicial Interventions Due to Trump’s Rhetoric
• Views of Democrats and Republicans on Trump’s Rhetoric
• Trump’s Support Base and His Rhetoric