Analysis: Pvt. Travis King’s Swift Release a Departure from North Korean Norms

50

Retaining Pvt. Travis King may never have been a logical decision for North Korea. Merely two months after he dashed across the high-security inter-Korean boundary, he was flown back to the United States subsequent to his release to American authorities.

This stands in contrast to other Americans who have been detained for extended periods by North Korea, including Otto Warmbier, a college student held for 17 months. Warmbier was in a comatose state when he was repatriated and subsequently passed away.

Distinguishing King’s case was his position among the 28,500 U.S. troops stationed in South Korea, intended to counter possible threats from North Korea, which possesses nuclear capabilities.

Additional Context on Pvt. Travis King’s Case

• U.S. successfully negotiates release of soldier who entered North Korea two months ago.
• Examination of other Americans who have trespassed into North Korean territory.
• Pvt. King’s mother speaks out about her son’s various motivations for returning home.

Initial speculation suggested that North Korea might seek to capitalize on the propaganda value of an active-duty U.S. soldier who voluntarily entered their territory, ostensibly due to his disillusionment with racial discrimination in the U.S. military and American society. However, officials from the Biden administration clarified that no concessions were made to facilitate King’s release.

When announcing King’s expulsion, North Korea’s official Korean Central News Agency provided scant details, stating only that King had admitted to illegal entry due to his “dissatisfaction with racial discrimination and inhumane treatment” within the U.S. Army.

Experts postulate that North Korea found King to be more of a liability than an asset. His legal issues—stemming from an assault conviction in South Korea—likely diluted his value for propaganda purposes. Being a low-ranking service member, King did not possess significant military intelligence, making it difficult for North Korea to justify the resources required to detain him.

Moon Seong Mook, a retired South Korean brigadier general with experience in military negotiations with North Korea, opined that North Korea is adept at evaluating the worthiness of detaining individuals. He suggested that the longer King remained, the more burdensome he would become.

Given the current impasse in diplomatic relations with the U.S., North Korea likely found little advantage in prolonging King’s detention. Hong Min, an analyst at Seoul’s Korea Institute for National Unification, posits that North Korea likely spent considerable time assessing King’s propaganda potential before concluding that it was limited.

This release occurs in a context where North Korean leader Kim Jong Un is enhancing alliances with Russia and China, indicating a strategic pivot away from seeking concessions from the United States. Ankit Panda, an expert with the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, stated that King’s release further solidifies North Korea’s diminishing interest in negotiations with the U.S.

In historical context, unauthorized crossings over the Korean Demilitarized Zone are exceedingly rare. King is the first American soldier to have done so in decades. His immediate release might also be a North Korean attempt to portray itself as a state that respects international laws and norms, especially when facing international criticism over human rights abuses.

Jenny Town, a senior fellow at the Stimson Center in Washington, speculated that the only compelling reason for North Korea to have considered retaining King was to highlight racial discrimination in the United States. Nonetheless, even that angle did not seem potent enough to warrant his continued detention.

Foreign nationals are always a delicate issue for North Korea, noted Leif-Eric Easley, a professor of international studies at Ewha Womans University in Seoul. Detainees can become diplomatic liabilities, especially if their health deteriorates during captivity, as was the case with Warmbier.

In conclusion, it appears that for Pvt. Travis King, North Korea opted for limited propaganda gains and chose to deport him before he could cause further complications.

---

Kim Tong-hyung has been a correspondent covering the Korean Peninsula for The Big Big News since 2014.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Pvt. Travis King’s Release

More about Pvt. Travis King’s Release

• Pvt. Travis King Background Information
• Recent U.S. Detainees in North Korea
• Biden Administration’s North Korea Policy
• Otto Warmbier’s Case: A Comparison
• North Korea’s Alliances with Russia and China
• U.S.-North Korea Relations: Historical Context
• The Korean Demilitarized Zone (DMZ)
• Profile of Kim Tong-hyung, the Author
• North Korea’s Human Rights Record
• The Stimson Center: Expert Analysis on North Korea