LOGIN

Three Colorado Men to Face Trial for Alleged Involvement in Rock-Throwing Incident That Led to Fatal Crash

by Michael Nguyen
5 comments
Colorado Rock-Throwing Trial

A judge has ruled that three individuals will face trial for their purported roles in the death of a 20-year-old motorist. The victim suffered a fatal head injury after a rock shattered her windshield and struck her. The decision came from 1st Judicial District Judge Christopher Zenisek, following a review of the evidence presented by investigators.

Joseph Koenig, Nicholas Karol-Chik, and Zachary Kwak have been charged with first-degree murder for their alleged involvement in the tragic demise of Alexa Bartell on April 19. The ruling also indicated sufficient grounds to charge the trio with attempted murder in relation to six additional vehicles targeted in rock-throwing episodes on the same night. Minor injuries were sustained by three individuals in those separate incidents.

In a separate but related charge, Koenig and Karol-Chick, both 19, will additionally be tried for attempted murder and attempted assault. This is in connection to an event on April 1 where the pair is alleged to have thrown a landscaping statue at a vehicle containing a family. Kwak, 18, is not implicated in this particular event.

Prosecution claims that the accused drove in Karol-Chik’s pickup truck on the night Bartell was fatally injured, filling it with landscaping rocks sourced from a Walmart store. After witnessing Bartell’s vehicle veer off the road post-impact, the individuals returned to capture a photograph of the incident instead of rendering assistance, according to Chief Deputy District Attorney Katharine Decker.

It remains unclear who specifically threw the rock that led to Bartell’s death. DNA evidence did not implicate any of the defendants, and their statements about the event are conflicting. However, Decker argued that the exact identity of the thrower is immaterial, as all three were complicit in the act and supported one another in it.

Contradictory statements further cloud the case. Kwak asserts that Koenig was the one driving and throwing the rock, while Karol-Chik points the finger at Kwak. Karol-Chik also confessed that he and Koenig had engaged in similar rock-throwing activities on at least ten prior occasions.

Legal representatives for the defendants have requested additional time to contemplate filing motions to separate their clients’ trials, leading to a delay in entering pleas. Prosecutor Decker suggested that multiple trials might be a possibility given the complexity of the case.

The individuals were apprehended several days post-incident at their residences in suburban Denver, aided by mobile phone tower data and another acquaintance who had been with them earlier that day.

This ongoing investigation has been supplemented with reporting from Thomas Peipert, a Denver-based correspondent for Big Big News.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Colorado Rock-Throwing Trial

What is the main issue that led to the trial of the three young men?

The three young men, Joseph Koenig, Nicholas Karol-Chik, and Zachary Kwak, are facing trial for their alleged involvement in the death of a 20-year-old woman named Alexa Bartell. She died from a head injury caused by a rock that shattered her car’s windshield. The individuals are charged with first-degree murder and attempted murder in relation to other similar incidents that occurred on the same night.

Who made the decision to move forward with the trial?

1st Judicial District Judge Christopher Zenisek ruled that there was enough evidence at this stage to prosecute the three young men for the charges brought against them, including first-degree murder.

Are the accused facing any other charges?

Yes, apart from the first-degree murder charge for Alexa Bartell’s death, the individuals are also facing attempted murder charges for six additional rock-throwing incidents that occurred on the same night. Additionally, Koenig and Karol-Chik will be tried for another incident that happened on April 1, where they are alleged to have thrown a landscaping statue at a vehicle containing a family.

What is the key evidence presented by the prosecution?

The prosecution relies on a range of evidence, including the fact that the men allegedly drove around in a pickup truck, filled it with rocks, and engaged in rock-throwing activities. Chief Deputy District Attorney Katharine Decker also emphasized that, after the fatal incident, the accused returned to the scene to photograph it instead of providing assistance.

Is there any DNA evidence linking the accused to the crime?

No, the only DNA found on the rock that led to Alexa Bartell’s death was her own. The prosecution argues that the absence of DNA evidence is not crucial, as all three individuals were complicit and supported each other in the act.

Are there any conflicting statements among the accused?

Yes, the accused have made conflicting statements about who actually threw the fatal rock. Kwak asserts that Koenig was the one driving and threw the rock, while Karol-Chik points the finger at Kwak.

What is the status of the legal proceedings?

Legal representatives for the accused have requested additional time to consider filing motions to separate their clients’ trials. This has led to a delay in entering pleas, and multiple trials may be a possibility given the complexity of the case.

More about Colorado Rock-Throwing Trial

  • Original News Source
  • Legal Definitions: First-Degree Murder
  • What Constitutes Attempted Murder?
  • Overview of Colorado’s Judicial System
  • Methods of Gathering Cellphone Tower Data in Criminal Investigations
  • The Role of a Chief Deputy District Attorney

You may also like

5 comments

LegalEagle October 19, 2023 - 8:41 am

The conflicting statements are gonna make this a complicated case for sure. But still, they were all complicit. No DNA or not, they have to face the music.

Reply
Gearhead91 October 19, 2023 - 10:41 am

I just cant wrap my head around it. Going around throwing rocks at cars is one thing (not that it’s okay), but to actually kill someone and then go back for a photo? That’s messed up.

Reply
FinancialGuru October 19, 2023 - 3:17 pm

This is gonna have legal repercussions far and wide, especially with how evidence like cellphone tower data is being used. Interesting but tragic case.

Reply
CivicMom October 19, 2023 - 6:17 pm

truly heartbreaking. That poor family has to deal with this senseless act. And for what? A picture??

Reply
JohnDoe42 October 19, 2023 - 10:13 pm

Wow, this is some intense stuff. Cant believe these guys actually went back to take a photo instead of helping her. What’s wrong with people these days?

Reply

Leave a Comment

logo-site-white

BNB – Big Big News is a news portal that offers the latest news from around the world. BNB – Big Big News focuses on providing readers with the most up-to-date information from the U.S. and abroad, covering a wide range of topics, including politics, sports, entertainment, business, health, and more.

Editors' Picks

Latest News

© 2023 BBN – Big Big News

en_USEnglish