CourtsDistrict of ColumbiaGeneral NewsLGBTQ peopleWashington news Supreme Court Declines to Review Laws Prohibiting Conversion Therapy for LGBTQ+ Minors by Madison Thomas December 11, 2023 written by Madison Thomas December 11, 2023 4 comments Bookmark 34 On Monday, the Supreme Court chose not to review a dispute concerning the legality of laws enacted by state and local governments that prohibit conversion therapy for LGBTQ+ minors. Despite objections from three conservative justices, the court declined an appeal from Washington state, where such a law has been affirmed. Conversely, a regional appellate court invalidated similar bans in Florida, deeming them unconstitutional limitations on the free speech of counselors. The Supreme Court typically intervenes in instances of conflicting appellate court decisions. Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas, in separate statements, argued that this disagreement over conversion therapy bans warranted the court’s involvement. Thomas expressed his view that the court should have considered the Washington case, arguing that the current law unfairly restricts licensed counselors from expressing any view contrary to the state-sanctioned stance on minors with gender dysphoria, under penalty. Justice Brett Kavanaugh also supported reviewing the case. A minimum of four justices is required to schedule a case for hearing. This decision to bypass the Washington case occurs amid a nationwide trend of restricting LGBTQ+ minors’ rights. Approximately half of the U.S. states have laws forbidding attempts to alter an individual’s sexual orientation or gender identity through therapy. Brian Tingley, a family counselor in Washington, challenged a 2018 state law that penalizes therapists practicing conversion therapy with potential license revocation. Tingley argued that this law infringes upon his rights to free speech. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the law in a divided ruling. Previously, the Supreme Court had rejected several appeals against state-level conversion therapy bans. However, these cases were brought before a pivotal 2018 Supreme Court ruling. In that decision, the court determined that California could not compel state-licensed anti-abortion crisis pregnancy centers to disseminate information about abortion. Following the 2018 decision, the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta overturned the local bans in Florida. Table of Contents Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Supreme Court LGBTQ+ Conversion Therapy BanWhat was the Supreme Court’s decision regarding conversion therapy bans for LGBTQ+ children?Which justices dissented from the Supreme Court’s decision on conversion therapy bans?What was the basis of the legal challenge against conversion therapy bans?Have there been previous Supreme Court cases related to conversion therapy bans?What is the current status of conversion therapy bans in the United States?More about Supreme Court LGBTQ+ Conversion Therapy Ban Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Supreme Court LGBTQ+ Conversion Therapy Ban What was the Supreme Court’s decision regarding conversion therapy bans for LGBTQ+ children? The Supreme Court decided not to review a case about the legality of state and local government bans on conversion therapy for LGBTQ+ children, maintaining the status quo of these laws. Which justices dissented from the Supreme Court’s decision on conversion therapy bans? Justices Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, and Brett Kavanaugh dissented from the decision not to review the laws banning conversion therapy for LGBTQ+ minors. What was the basis of the legal challenge against conversion therapy bans? The legal challenge against conversion therapy bans was based on the argument that such laws violate therapists’ free speech rights, as upheld by an appellate court in Florida. Have there been previous Supreme Court cases related to conversion therapy bans? Yes, the Supreme Court had previously rejected several challenges to state bans on conversion therapy, but those cases were brought before a significant 2018 ruling regarding state-licensed anti-abortion crisis pregnancy centers. What is the current status of conversion therapy bans in the United States? Approximately half of the states in the U.S. have laws prohibiting attempts to change an individual’s sexual orientation or gender identity through therapy. More about Supreme Court LGBTQ+ Conversion Therapy Ban Supreme Court and LGBTQ+ Rights Conversion Therapy Laws in the United States Legal Challenges Against Conversion Therapy Bans Supreme Court Rulings on Free Speech Rights You Might Be Interested In A Catholic nun appreciates the Dodgers’ management of the Pride Night dispute while some archbishops label it as sacrilege Eastern US prepares for year’s peak temperatures as extreme heat travels east Virginia Electorate to Determine Control of Legislature Amidst Intense Debate Over Abortion Rights Review Panel Recommends Disbarring Rudy Giuliani for Promoting Trump’s False Election Claims Russian Teen Mirra Andreeva Makes Waves at Wimbledon, Reaches Fourth Round Key Developments in the Ongoing Israel-Hamas Conflict Conversion Therapy LawsCourtsDistrict of ColumbiaGeneral NewsLGBTQ peopleLGBTQ+ rightsSupreme Court decision Share 0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail Madison Thomas Follow Author Madison Thomas is a food journalist who covers the latest news and trends in the world of cuisine. She enjoys exploring new recipes and culinary trends, and she is always on the lookout for new and exciting flavors to try. previous post ‘Barbie’ leads Golden Globe nominations with 9, followed closely by ‘Oppenheimer’ next post Decision by Jury on Giuliani’s Compensation for Defamation of Election Workers You may also like Bookmark A woman who burned Wyoming’s only full-service abortion... December 28, 2023 Bookmark Argument over Christmas gifts turns deadly as 14-year-old... December 28, 2023 Bookmark Danny Masterson sent to state prison to serve... December 28, 2023 Bookmark Hong Kong man jailed for 6 years after... December 28, 2023 Bookmark AP concludes at least hundreds died in floods... December 28, 2023 Bookmark Live updates | Israeli forces raid a West... December 28, 2023 4 comments MarkusJ December 12, 2023 - 2:33 am it’s interesting to see how different courts view the free speech aspect, i mean where do we draw the line right? Reply JohnDoe76 December 12, 2023 - 3:41 am wow, i can’t believe the court decided to pass on this. it’s a huge deal for the LGBTQ+ community rights?? Reply SaraJ_89 December 12, 2023 - 4:39 am so half the states still allow this kind of therapy? thats shocking, need more awareness on this issue. Reply AnnaSmith22 December 12, 2023 - 3:32 pm This is confusing, like how can they not see the importance of these bans? It’s about protecting kids after all. Reply Leave a Comment Cancel Reply Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Δ