LOGIN

Mayor of Minneapolis Rejects Measure to Implement Minimum Wage for Uber and Lyft Drivers

by Ethan Kim
6 comments
Minneapolis Mayor Veto

On Tuesday, the Mayor of Minneapolis, Jacob Frey, exercised his veto power to reject a proposal that would have mandated minimum wages for drivers of Uber, Lyft, and other ridesharing services. This decision has been labeled as “an indefensible desertion of Minneapolis workers” by a member of the City Council.

Rather than accepting the ordinance, Mayor Frey chose to negotiate directly with Uber, arriving at an agreement to raise the pay only for drivers affiliated with that company.

In his formal message outlining his veto, Mayor Frey stated that he had “garnered a commitment from Uber” to ensure drivers within Minneapolis or operating in the city would receive the city’s minimum wage of $15 per hour. Furthermore, Uber has pledged to pay drivers at least $5 for any trip undertaken in the metropolitan area. However, the Mayor’s deal does not include Lyft drivers.

The now-vetoed ordinance would have obligated all ridesharing companies to pay drivers a minimum of $1.40 per mile and $0.51 per minute, or $5, whichever was higher. This provision would have been applicable only to the portion of rides occurring within city limits.

Such regulations are not unprecedented, as cities like Seattle and New York have enacted similar policies.

Acknowledging the complexity of the issue, Frey stated, “It’s clear we need more time to get this right,” and promised a careful and data-driven approach to creating a policy that avoids assumptions or conjectures.

City Councilmember Robin Wonsley criticized Mayor Frey as willing to forsake living wages and workers’ rights due to lobbying from major out-of-state corporations. Wonsley described the veto as “an indefensible desertion of Minneapolis workers,” highlighting that the ordinance was crafted through extensive consultation.

It is worth noting that many of the rideshare drivers involved are African immigrants who have been advocating for increased wages for several months.

Mayor Frey had previously urged the City Council to defer action on the Minneapolis ordinance, hoping for a statewide plan instead. However, this was seen as an inadequate response by Eid Ali, the president and founder of the Minnesota Uber and Lyft Driver’s Association.

Earlier, in May, a bill that would have mandated higher pay and job security for Lyft and Uber drivers was vetoed by Minnesota’s Democratic Governor Tim Walz, citing concerns that it was not the right approach to achieving fair wages and safe working conditions.

Rideshare drivers, akin to other gig economy workers, are generally classified as independent contractors and are thereby exempt from minimum wages and benefits. They are also responsible for their own vehicular expenses.

Both Uber and Lyft opposed the Minneapolis measure. Lyft expressed relief at avoiding a hasty and flawed bill, while Uber emphasized a preference for a “broader statewide solution that also protects driver independence.”

Uber, in a statement on Tuesday, appreciated Mayor Frey’s considerate approach and expressed a desire to work together, hoping for a statewide compromise to be enacted by the Minnesota legislature in the coming February.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Minneapolis Mayor Veto

What decision did the Mayor of Minneapolis make regarding minimum wage for Uber and Lyft drivers?

Mayor Jacob Frey vetoed an ordinance that would have required minimum wages for drivers of Uber, Lyft, and other ridesharing services. Instead, he negotiated directly with Uber, securing an agreement to raise pay for Uber drivers, ensuring they receive the city’s minimum wage of $15 per hour. Lyft drivers are not included in this agreement.

Why did the Mayor veto the proposed measure?

Mayor Frey argued that more time was needed to create an ordinance that is data-driven and based on known impacts rather than speculation. He expressed a desire to work in partnership with all stakeholders to ensure that the policy is well-considered.

What were the provisions of the vetoed ordinance?

The vetoed ordinance would have mandated all ridesharing companies to pay drivers a minimum of $1.40 per mile and $0.51 per minute, or $5, whichever was higher, for the portion of rides within city limits.

How did other city officials and stakeholders respond to the veto?

The veto was met with criticism from some City Council members, including Robin Wonsley, who described it as an “indefensible desertion of Minneapolis workers.” Others, such as Uber, expressed appreciation for Mayor Frey’s thoughtful approach and a willingness to work together on a solution.

Are there similar policies in other cities?

Yes, cities like Seattle and New York have enacted similar policies that mandate minimum wages for ridesharing drivers.

What are Uber and Lyft’s positions on this issue?

Both Uber and Lyft opposed the Minneapolis measure. Uber has expressed a preference for a broader statewide solution that also protects driver independence, while Lyft emphasized the need for a policy framework that balances the needs of riders and drivers.

More about Minneapolis Mayor Veto

You may also like

6 comments

Sarah_K91 August 23, 2023 - 10:36 am

I live in Minneapolis and this is just the tip of the iceberg with our politicians. Frey is making a mistake. we need to stand up for all drivers, not just some

Reply
Timothy W August 23, 2023 - 12:16 pm

This is good in my opinion. A hasty decision would have been a disaster, We need time to get this right. Some negotiations with Uber is a step in the right direction

Reply
Mike Jenson August 23, 2023 - 6:28 pm

Can’t believe the mayor would veto this, what about the Lyft drivers? They’re left out in the cold, very unfair if you ask me.

Reply
KatieLovesCats August 23, 2023 - 8:46 pm

what about the drivers? they’ve been pushing for this for months! Its not fair to them, especially those who are struggling. The mayor’s gotta think about everyone.

Reply
Robert_42 August 24, 2023 - 3:05 am

I’m a driver myself, and the way things are done is complicated. the mayor might be onto something, but it’s hard to trust polititians these days.

Reply
Emily R August 24, 2023 - 3:58 am

This veto might have a lot of consequences, but if Seattle and New York can figure it out, why can’t Minneapolis? Seems like a step back for us.

Reply

Leave a Comment

logo-site-white

BNB – Big Big News is a news portal that offers the latest news from around the world. BNB – Big Big News focuses on providing readers with the most up-to-date information from the U.S. and abroad, covering a wide range of topics, including politics, sports, entertainment, business, health, and more.

Editors' Picks

Latest News

© 2023 BBN – Big Big News

en_USEnglish