LOGIN

Investigation into Titanic-Bound Sub’s Implosion Raises Regulatory Questions

by Ethan Kim
3 comments
submersible tragedy

As authorities continue their search for answers regarding the implosion of a submersible en route to the Titanic wreck, concerns are arising about the regulation of such expeditions. Tributes are pouring in for the five individuals who tragically lost their lives in the incident.

The five-day ordeal involving the vessel known as the Titan came to a devastating conclusion when it was announced that no survivors were found. Rear Adm. John Mauger of the First Coast Guard District confirmed that the investigation was already underway and would persist in the vicinity of the Titanic wreckage, where debris from the submersible had been discovered. Mauger acknowledged the complexity of the case, as it occurred in a remote part of the ocean and involved people from different countries.

A U.S. Navy official, speaking anonymously due to the sensitivity of the information, revealed that acoustic data analysis had uncovered an “anomaly” consistent with an implosion or explosion in the vicinity of the submersible when communication was lost. This revelation provides the first indication of a possible timeline for the incident.

Among those who tragically lost their lives were Stockton Rush, CEO of OceanGate Expeditions—the company that owned and operated the submersible—two members of a prominent Pakistani family, Shahzada Dawood and his son Suleman Dawood, British adventurer Hamish Harding, and Titanic expert Paul-Henri Nargeolet.

The Titan embarked on its journey at 6 a.m. on Sunday but was reported overdue later that afternoon, approximately 435 miles (700 kilometers) south of St. John’s, Newfoundland. Rescue teams were promptly dispatched to the area.

Any remaining hope of finding the crew alive dissipated when the submersible’s 96-hour air supply was expected to be depleted, and the Coast Guard confirmed the discovery of debris approximately 1,600 feet (488 meters) from the Titanic. Mauger stated that the recovered debris indicated a catastrophic loss of the pressure chamber, suggesting that the crew members were unlikely to have survived. The Navy official clarified that the anomaly data had been shared with the Coast Guard but was not initially considered definitive, thus prompting the continued search efforts.

Condolences and recognition for the search teams poured in from around the world. The family of Hamish Harding expressed their deep sorrow, acknowledging his remarkable achievements and the fact that he lost his life pursuing his passion. The Dawood family conveyed their gratitude to the rescuers, whose unwavering efforts provided strength during this challenging time. Paul-Henri Nargeolet’s longtime friend and colleague, Christian Pétron, expressed his immediate concern for the crew members’ safety upon losing contact, stating that he suspected an implosion given the immense pressure at those depths.

Renowned director James Cameron, who has personally explored the Titanic wreckage, shared his certainty that an “extreme catastrophic event” had occurred when he learned that the submersible had lost navigation and communication simultaneously. He criticized the prolonged communication regarding the oxygen supply and banging noises as a tormenting charade that provided false hope to the families.

The safety of OceanGate’s submersible has been called into question by a former employee and former passengers. Experts point out that the deep-sea exploration industry lacks adequate regulation. OceanGate’s former director of marine operations, David Lochridge, raised concerns in 2018, claiming that the company’s method of acoustic monitoring to detect hull cracks and weaknesses was insufficient and posed potential dangers. OceanGate disputed these allegations, stating that Lochridge was not an engineer and had been terminated after refusing to accept the assurances provided by the lead engineer regarding the effectiveness of the acoustic monitoring and testing protocol.

Deep-sea exploration often operates outside the purview of existing laws and conventions. The Titan was neither registered as a U.S. vessel nor adhered to international safety regulations. According to Salvatore Mercogliano, a history professor specializing in maritime history and policy, the submersible was not classified by a maritime industry group responsible for setting standards in hull construction and related matters.

Stockton Rush, the CEO of OceanGate Expeditions, who tragically perished aboard the Titan, had expressed his aversion to being constrained by such regulations.

In 2021 and 2022, at least 46 individuals successfully journeyed to the Titanic wreck site using OceanGate’s submersible, as stated in letters filed by the company with a U.S. District Court in Norfolk, Virginia, which oversees matters involving the Titanic shipwreck.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about submersible implosion

What is the focus of the investigation mentioned in the text?

The investigation focuses on the implosion of a submersible that was en route to the Titanic wreck.

What questions are being raised regarding the incident?

Questions are being raised about the regulation of such expeditions and the safety of the submersible involved.

How many people lost their lives in the incident?

Five individuals tragically lost their lives in the implosion of the submersible.

Was there any hope of finding survivors?

No, any remaining hope of finding survivors was extinguished when the submersible’s air supply was expected to run out, and debris was discovered indicating a catastrophic loss of the pressure chamber.

What concerns were raised about the submersible’s safety?

Both a former employee and former passengers raised concerns about the submersible’s safety, particularly regarding the method of hull monitoring and the lack of regulation in the deep-sea exploration industry.

Was the submersible regulated and classified according to safety standards?

No, the submersible was not registered as a U.S. vessel, did not adhere to international safety regulations, and was not classified by a maritime industry group responsible for setting standards in hull construction.

More about submersible implosion

You may also like

3 comments

curiousmind June 23, 2023 - 6:03 pm

so there are no rules for exploring the deep sea? that’s crazy! we need regulations to ensure everyone’s safety. hope they figure out what went wrong with the sub.

Reply
adventureseeker June 24, 2023 - 5:41 am

wow, those ppl on the sub must’ve been so brave to go down there! but it sounds like they didn’t follow the rules… regulations are important, u know?

Reply
deepseaexplorer June 24, 2023 - 11:28 am

i’ve always been fascinated by deep-sea exploration. it’s a dangerous world down there, and this incident shows how risky it can be. we need better safety measures!

Reply

Leave a Comment

logo-site-white

BNB – Big Big News is a news portal that offers the latest news from around the world. BNB – Big Big News focuses on providing readers with the most up-to-date information from the U.S. and abroad, covering a wide range of topics, including politics, sports, entertainment, business, health, and more.

Editors' Picks

Latest News

© 2023 BBN – Big Big News

en_USEnglish