Effectiveness of Sanctions on Russian Tycoons and the Impact on Ukraine

by Andrew Wright
Sanctions Impact

Sitting amidst the historical charm of Verona, billionaire Igor Makarov reflects on the consequences of Western sanctions that have frozen his vast fortune, largely amassed through business dealings in Russia and the former Soviet Union. As his energy ventures remain on hold and his personal assets, including a seized yacht and grounded private jets, are immobilized, Makarov questions the true purpose of these sanctions and their impact on Ukraine. In a rare interview, he ponders whether these measures truly punish President Vladimir Putin and contribute to Ukraine’s well-being.

Western governments have imposed sanctions on numerous billionaires with the aim of isolating Putin, cutting off financial support for his military endeavors, and turning the wealthy elite against him. Peter Stano, the European Commission’s Foreign Affairs spokesperson, emphasizes the objective of making these tycoons “feel the consequences” of their associations with Putin unless they exhibit a “change in behavior.”

However, despite these efforts and the White House’s proposal to seize targeted tycoons’ assets to benefit Ukraine, the results have been mixed. In the 21 months since these sanctions were implemented, few of the sanctioned individuals have openly criticized Putin, and only a fraction of the estimated $58 billion in frozen private assets has reached Kyiv. Some wealthy businessmen are challenging the sanctions in court, claiming the process is opaque, illegal, and unjust.

While these sanctions have undeniably created challenges for the tycoons, their immediate impact on Ukraine remains limited. Nigel Gould-Davies, a former British ambassador, suggests that an alternative approach may be necessary to enhance the effectiveness of sanctions and provide financial assistance to Kyiv.

One controversial proposal is to offer sanctioned individuals a clear path to sanctions relief in exchange for financial contributions and public condemnation of Putin. This idea faces resistance among Western governments, as it raises concerns about the perception that tycoons can buy their way off sanctions lists, and it lacks support from Ukraine.

Throughout his tenure, Putin has relied on Russia’s elite to finance his initiatives and criticized wealthy Russians with pro-Western views who move their assets abroad. Western nations have viewed a significant portion of Russian wealth as “proceeds of corruption” and an opportunity to crack down on these financial resources.

However, some critics argue that sanctions, without a clear intended outcome, are insufficient. Fiona Hill, a former senior official at the U.S. National Security Council, emphasizes that punishment alone is ineffective. The scope of personal asset freezes extends from top officials like Putin to oligarchs and regional figures, causing varying degrees of disruption in their lives.

Igor Makarov, for instance, has faced substantial asset freezes and accusations related to his involvement in the Russian energy sector. He denies any wrongdoing and asserts that he ceased business operations in Russia in 2013. Nevertheless, over 90% of his assets, totaling more than $1.6 billion, are frozen in several Western countries.

While some tycoons have condemned the war, many remain silent due to concerns about potential retaliation against themselves or their relatives in Russia. Oleg Tinkov and Arkady Volozh are among the few who have spoken out, but the impact on their sanctions status varies.

Sanctions have been applied incrementally, leading to debates about their effectiveness. Ambassador Daniel Fried, who led the U.S. State Department’s response to Russian sanctions, argues that sanctions pressure the Russian system but are not decisive on their own. The challenge lies in liquidating the assets of sanctioned individuals, which can take years and often requires proof of criminal activity.

To address this complexity, experts propose a more innovative approach. One idea suggests allowing Russian businessmen to defect to the West, denounce the war, and make significant donations to Ukraine. While Western officials emphasize that tycoons cannot buy their way off sanctions lists, the concept of donations and denunciations is being explored.

In June, Britain introduced a plan for tycoons to donate frozen funds to Ukraine’s reconstruction, but the Foreign Office clarified that it would not guarantee sanctions relief in return. The possibility of reviewing sanctions in response to donations and denunciations, however, suggests a potential shift in policy.

Ukraine, while not supporting sanctions relief for tycoons, might consider it if a substantial portion of their assets is allocated for reconstruction and if there is a clear public condemnation of Putin and the war.

In conclusion, the effectiveness of sanctions on Russian tycoons and their impact on Ukraine remains a complex and evolving issue. While sanctions have undoubtedly created challenges for these individuals, their immediate benefits for Ukraine have been limited. Exploring innovative approaches that combine sanctions with donations and public denunciations may offer a path forward, although these ideas remain contentious and require careful consideration by Western governments and Ukraine alike.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Sanctions Impact

What are the main objectives of Western sanctions on Russian tycoons?

Western sanctions on Russian tycoons primarily aim to isolate President Vladimir Putin, cut off financial support for his military endeavors, and encourage these wealthy individuals to distance themselves from Putin’s regime.

Have these sanctions been effective in achieving their goals?

The effectiveness of these sanctions is a subject of debate. While they have created challenges for the sanctioned tycoons, few have openly criticized Putin, and only a fraction of frozen assets has reached Ukraine. Some wealthy businessmen are contesting the sanctions in court, questioning their legality and fairness.

How do these sanctions impact Ukraine?

In the short term, these sanctions have had limited benefits for Ukraine. While there is a desire to send funds to Ukraine, the complexity of liquidating the assets of sanctioned individuals, who are generally not accused of criminal wrongdoing, poses challenges.

What alternative approaches have been suggested to enhance the effectiveness of sanctions?

One proposal involves offering a clear path to sanctions relief for sanctioned individuals in exchange for financial contributions and public condemnation of Putin. However, this idea is controversial and faces resistance among Western governments and lacks support from Ukraine.

Are there any tycoons who have spoken out against the war and faced varying sanctions outcomes?

Yes, some tycoons have spoken out against the war, such as Oleg Tinkov and Arkady Volozh. However, the impact on their sanctions status varies, highlighting the complexity of the issue.

How do Western officials view the role of sanctions in their approach to Russia?

Western officials see sanctions as part of a toolbox to exert pressure on Putin and the Russian system, but they acknowledge that sanctions alone are not decisive in achieving their objectives.

What role does the frozen assets of sanctioned individuals play in these discussions?

The frozen assets of sanctioned individuals are a crucial aspect of the debate. The challenge lies in liquidating these assets, which can take years and often requires proof of criminal activity. New legislation has allowed some frozen assets to be sent to Ukraine, but this process remains intricate.

How does Ukraine view the idea of sanctions relief for tycoons?

Ukraine does not support sanctions relief for tycoons unless a significant portion of their assets is allocated for reconstruction, and there is a clear and public condemnation of Putin and the war. This perspective reflects Ukraine’s stance on the matter.

More about Sanctions Impact

You may also like


CryptoExpert December 10, 2023 - 5:06 pm

they talk abt sanctions on russians, need more info on cryptocurrency, tho.

EconEnthusiast December 10, 2023 - 5:29 pm

gud insights on sanctions impact, but smtimes hard 2 follow w/o punctuations.

Reader123 December 10, 2023 - 7:50 pm

wow, this is a long article, but vry informative, luv how they talk bout sanctions n ukraine

PoliticGeek December 10, 2023 - 8:41 pm

dis article raises interesting questions bout sanctions, but need more politics.

CarBuff December 11, 2023 - 6:15 am

not sure why this article is in my feed, im into cars, nt sanctions n stuff.


Leave a Comment


BNB – Big Big News is a news portal that offers the latest news from around the world. BNB – Big Big News focuses on providing readers with the most up-to-date information from the U.S. and abroad, covering a wide range of topics, including politics, sports, entertainment, business, health, and more.

Editors' Picks

Latest News

© 2023 BBN – Big Big News