A Landmark Decision for Black Voters: Alabama to Overhaul Congressional Districts

37

Alabama is set to undergo its first major overhaul of congressional districts in 30 years following a refusal by the U.S. Supreme Court to allow the state to continue using its existing electoral map, which features only one majority-Black district.

The Court’s ruling on Tuesday paves the way for a revised map that offers increased representation for Black voters, scheduled to be implemented in time for the 2024 elections. This decision represents a triumph for Black citizens in Alabama who had contended that the existing districts were racially prejudiced. Proponents of the decision express optimism that it will encourage similar redistricting efforts across the nation.

Key Developments

The Supreme Court rejected Alabama’s urgent appeal to maintain the current, Republican-devised congressional layout, and halted a three-judge panel from being overridden by the state’s ongoing appeal. The panel had determined that Alabama’s plan—featuring a solitary majority-Black district out of seven in a state where 27% of the population is Black—likely contravened the U.S. Voting Rights Act. The panel stipulated that the revised map must have a second district where the majority of voters are Black, or very nearly so.

Next Steps

The designated three-judge panel will expedite the process of redrafting new electoral districts for use in the 2024 elections. A hearing will be conducted on Tuesday to discuss three alternative plans put forth by a court-appointed special master. Both the plaintiffs and the state have been directed by the court to submit any objections to these proposed plans within the week. Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall stated that although the state will persist in its legal endeavors to reinstate its self-drawn districts, it is likely to operate under a court-designed map for the 2024 electoral cycle.

Related Developments

The Supreme Court’s decision to allow Alabama to redraw its map to be more inclusive of its Black voters aligns with ongoing redistricting cases in Louisiana, Georgia, Florida, and other states. These cases also argue that current maps dilute the political influence of Black communities.

Implications of the New Map

Under the three proposed alternatives, Congressional District 2 in southeastern Alabama, currently represented by Republican Rep. Barry Moore, would be reconfigured such that Black voters make up between 48.5% and 50.1% of the voting-age population. This change could potentially swing the district toward Democratic representation. The special master highlighted that candidates favored by Black voters would have triumphed in 13 or more of the last 17 elections under such configurations. In contrast, the existing district, crafted by Republican legislators, consists of a Black voting-age population of only 39.9%, thus predominantly electing white Republicans.

Reactions to the Decision

This ruling is a long-awaited victory for Black voters and advocacy organizations that had filed legal challenges against the Alabama districts. Deuel Ross, an attorney with the NAACP Legal Defense Fund who represented the case in the Supreme Court, stated that the Court had dismissed Alabama’s attempts to reargue already-settled matters and to openly contravene what had been identified as a violation of the Voting Rights Act.

Plaintiffs compared the state’s defiance to the actions of segregationist Governor George Wallace in 1963, who resisted orders to integrate. Despite such obstructions, the Supreme Court reaffirmed that Black Alabamians are entitled to a “second opportunity district,” according to the plaintiffs.

Attorney General Marshall criticized the plaintiffs for prioritizing “racial quotas” over conventional redistricting principles. He asserted that Alabama will now operate under a court-devised, racially gerrymandered map for the 2024 elections and emphasized that he believes the Voting Rights Act and the Constitution do not mandate “separate but equal” congressional districts.

The Protracted Legal Journey

The complex legal battle in Alabama was initiated by collectives of Black voters who challenged the state’s existing congressional map on the grounds of racial discrimination. Though an initial Supreme Court decision in 2022 had temporarily suspended any changes ahead of the 2022 elections, a subsequent 5-4 ruling in June upheld the panel’s conclusions. The state legislature’s July attempt to retain one majority-Black district was subsequently rebuked by the three-judge panel in early September, leading them to take charge of the redistricting process.

National Ramifications

The Alabama case is being closely monitored by legal experts and advocacy groups involved in similar redistricting challenges in other states, as it is perceived as setting a precedent that could influence those cases. Kareem Crayton, a redistricting specialist at the Brennan Center for Justice, stated that parties in these other states are indeed scrutinizing the developments in Alabama.

Thus, the Court’s decision not only has immediate implications for Alabama’s political landscape but also holds the potential to reverberate throughout the nation.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Alabama Redistricting

More about Alabama Redistricting

• U.S. Supreme Court Decision on Alabama Redistricting
• Voting Rights Act: An Overview
• Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall’s Statement
• Brennan Center for Justice on Redistricting
• NAACP Legal Defense Fund on Alabama Case
• Congressional Redistricting and Its Impact on U.S. Elections
• Ongoing Redistricting Cases in Louisiana, Georgia, and Florida