Journalist Penalized by Illinois City for Excessive Inquiries, Stirring First Amendment Concerns

35

In a recent confrontation over First Amendment rights, a municipal journalist in a suburb of Chicago faced citations for what has been described as excessive attempts to contact city officials for commentary on dangerous autumn flooding.

Calumet City, with a population of 35,000 and situated 24 miles south of Chicago, has accused Hank Sanders, a journalist for the Daily Southtown, of “interference with city employees” as he pursued statements for his reporting, according to a Chicago Tribune article from Friday.

This event joins a series of constitutional disputes nationwide, including the arrest of a journalist and publisher from a local Alabama newspaper following their coverage of a school district under grand jury scrutiny, and a police search of a Kansas newspaper and its publisher’s residence over conflicts with a local business owner.

In his October 20 article, Sanders detailed consultants’ warnings to Calumet City leaders about inadequate stormwater systems, following destructive September rainfall. Despite official statements, Sanders made repeated calls and sent emails to city staff, eliciting objections from Mayor Thaddeus Jones, who also serves as a Democratic state legislator.

The Chicago Tribune, owning the Daily Southtown as well, mentioned that Sanders was instructed to direct inquiries through Mayor Jones’ spokesperson, Sean Howard. However, Sanders sent 14 emails over nine days in October with flood-related questions, as noted in one citation.

Chicago Tribune’s executive editor, Mitch Pugh, emphasized Sanders’ persistence stemmed from research for an upcoming article on the flooding. He pointed out these citations, although not as severe as other incidents, indicated a troubling trend of misunderstanding First Amendment protections, the role of journalism, and media’s societal function.

With a history of challenges at a national level, Pugh expressed concern over such issues arising in small municipalities, highlighting the need for public officials to recognize and respect the media’s role rather than employing intimidation tactics.

The constitutional right to freedom of the press is enshrined in the First Amendment, guarding against governmental hindrance.

Efforts to reach Jones for a response remained unanswered. Howard deferred to city attorney Patrick Walsh on this legal issue, and Walsh has yet to respond.

Don Craven, leading the Illinois Press Association, condemned the citations. He reaffirmed the media’s crucial democratic role, criticizing the city’s approach of faulting the journalist instead of addressing the problem at hand.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about First Amendment controversy

More about First Amendment controversy

• Chicago Tribune coverage on First Amendment issues
• Daily Southtown reporter’s flood inquiry controversy
• Illinois Press Association’s stance on journalist citations
• Legal implications of press freedom interference