In a remote, dry patch of California, a battle is raging over carrots

34

In the arid expanses of rural California, a fierce battle is unfolding, and it revolves around an unexpected commodity: carrots. In this remote region near New Cuyama, farmers like Lee Harrington find themselves embroiled in a legal dispute over groundwater rights, initiated by two major carrot producers, Grimmway Farms and Bolthouse Farms.

This lawsuit has cast a shadow over the community, located approximately 100 miles northwest of Los Angeles, burdening its residents with mounting legal expenses. Large signs along the roadway bear a simple message: “Boycott carrots and Stand with Cuyama.” Lee Harrington, among those ensnared in the legal turmoil, bemoans the situation, stating that his legal fees have already surpassed $50,000. He emphasizes that these agricultural giants aim to secure access to the region’s precious water resources without being subject to state regulations.

This ongoing battle symbolizes a new wave of water-related legal challenges in California, a state renowned for its agricultural production and a history of contentious water disputes. For many years, California allowed unrestricted access to groundwater, permitting both farmers and residents to extract as much as they needed. However, this laissez-faire approach changed in 2014 during a severe drought when deep well drilling led to land subsidence in some areas. The state introduced legislation requiring communities to establish local groundwater sustainability agencies tasked with developing plans, approved by the state, to manage their groundwater resources effectively. The most severely depleted basins, including Cuyama’s, were among the first to implement these measures, aiming to achieve sustainability by 2040, with other priority basins following suit.

Nevertheless, disputes arose in Cuyama and other regions, leading to a series of lawsuits that have drawn entire communities into courtrooms to defend their right to the groundwater beneath their feet. This legal fracas could serve as a precursor to similar conflicts as more regions adopt stringent groundwater regulations.

The lawsuit in Cuyama, where groundwater is a lifeline, has deeply affected every facet of this close-knit community, which values neighborly connections and where cellphone service is scarce. Even the school secretary moonlights as a bus driver, and one of the local vegetable growers also offers horseshoeing services. Amid the legal turmoil, concerns over water for daily needs like brushing teeth, doing laundry, and tending gardens are prevalent. The local water district has raised rates to cover legal expenses, and the school district, striving to keep its doors open for its 185 students, faces unexpected financial burdens.

Grimmway and Bolthouse, situated in the most heavily depleted part of the basin, have been actively involved in the formation of the local groundwater sustainability agency and its plans. Despite adhering to assigned water usage cutbacks, they contend that other farmers are not held to the same standards and seek judicial intervention to establish a more equitable solution for groundwater extraction across the entire basin, not just on their own properties.

Dan Clifford, vice president and general counsel of Bolthouse Land Co., underscores the importance of basin sustainability, stating that they are striving for a balanced approach with judicial oversight to ensure fairness.

Grimmway, which has been growing carrots in Cuyama for over three decades, has taken measures to reduce its water usage in the region and is committed to remaining there for the long term. Jeff Huckaby, the company’s president and CEO, lauds the region’s ideal conditions for carrot cultivation, emphasizing the significance of arid climates that encourage carrot roots to penetrate deeper for moisture.

This lawsuit has thrust Cuyama into the national spotlight, with many characterizing it as a David versus Goliath scenario. Residents like Jake Furstenfeld, a cattle rancher and member of the groundwater agency’s advisory committee, are actively involved in organizing the boycott against carrot consumption and have distributed yard signs in support of their cause.

The uncertainty surrounding this legal battle looms large, particularly concerning the availability of water resources for the community’s essential needs. For Cuyama’s school district, the water issue poses a direct threat to its existence. The residents remain concerned about the future and what it holds for their town’s water supply.

In summary, the legal dispute over groundwater rights in Cuyama, California, encapsulates a broader challenge facing the state as it grapples with regulating its vital water resources. The outcome of this lawsuit could set a precedent for how water disputes are resolved in agricultural regions, with significant implications for both residents and the agricultural industry in California.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Groundwater Dispute

More about Groundwater Dispute

• California’s Groundwater Management
• California’s New Groundwater Law
• Grimmway Farms
• Bolthouse Farms
• Importance of California Carrot Farming
• California’s Agriculture Statistics
• Land Subsidence in California