General NewsJapan governmentSeoulSouth KoreaSouth Korea governmentWorld News Demonstrations in South Korea against the Scheduled Disposal of Fukushima Wastewater Amid Visit of IAEA Chief by Michael Nguyen July 9, 2023 written by Michael Nguyen July 9, 2023 6 comments Bookmark 86 On Saturday, in Seoul, South Korea, hundreds took to the streets demanding Japan abandon its intentions to discharge treated wastewater from the ruined Fukushima nuclear power plant. These protests coincided with a visit by the chief of the United Nations’ nuclear agency, who was there to address public apprehensions about food safety. This wave of protests was sparked the day after the South Korean government officially approved the safety measures in the Japanese plan. The government confirmed that the contamination levels in the water pumped out from the plant would meet the acceptable standards and won’t significantly impact South Korean waters provided the plant’s treatment systems function as intended. This proclamation concurs with the stance of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), which endorsed the Japanese wastewater disposal plan earlier this week. According to the agency, the treated wastewater would align with global safety norms and have minimal impact on the environment and health. OTHER NEWS Nine individuals missing due to landslide in China caused by torrential rains amidst floods and soaring temperatures Highlights from AP’s investigation into a Texas sheriff’s alleged history of corruption and disarray Texas sheriff accused of corruption and disarray by deputies. A mass shooting followed Post-pandemic mass wedding event at New York’s Lincoln Center sparks a romantic atmosphere Despite the sweltering summer heat and under the surveillance of law enforcement, demonstrators assembled in a commercial area in downtown Seoul, carrying placards that read, “We condemn the oceanic disposal of Fukushima’s nuclear wastewater!” and “We oppose the oceanic discharge with our lives.” The protest march was orderly, with no significant conflicts or injuries reported. Han Sang-jin, a spokesperson for the Korean Confederation of Trade Unions, whose members comprised a large portion of the protesters, proposed alternative solutions, “Instead of discharging the water into the sea, Japan could store the water on land, among other suggestions.” He expressed his disdain for Japan’s plan, equating it to an “international crime.” The demonstrations occurred against the backdrop of a tense meeting between IAEA Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi and South Korean Foreign Minister Park Jin. They convened to deliberate the IAEA’s evaluation of the Japanese wastewater disposal plan. Park urged the IAEA to actively verify the safety of the released wastewater and reassure the South Korean public. Grossi stated his readiness to discuss concerns with critics, including South Korean opposition politicians, prior to his journey to South Korea. Upon his arrival, he was met by numerous incensed demonstrators at an airport near Seoul, condemning the IAEA’s approval of the disposal plan with signs such as “Dismantle IAEA!” and “Fukushima wastewater will definitely lead all humanity to disaster!” On Sunday, Grossi is expected to meet opposition Democratic Party lawmakers who have severely criticized the Japanese plan and accused President Yoon Suk Yeol’s conservative South Korean government of compromising public health in a bid to strengthen ties with Tokyo. The issue of Fukushima’s wastewater safety has been a point of contention for years between the two U.S. allies, Japan and South Korea. Lately, both have been making efforts to mend relations, traditionally fraught over wartime historical disputes, in order to jointly address challenges like the nuclear threat from North Korea and China’s aggressive foreign policy. South Korea’s endorsement of the disposal plan was partly based on findings by a team of government scientists who were permitted to inspect the Fukushima plant in May. The 2011 earthquake and tsunami wreaked havoc on the Fukushima plant’s cooling systems, leading to the meltdown of three reactors and massive radiation release. The plant’s operator, Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings, has been storing the treated water in hundreds of tanks that now cover most of the plant. These tanks are nearing full capacity. Japanese officials argue that the tanks must be removed to make space for constructing facilities for decommissioning the plant and to minimize the risk of leaks in case of another disaster. The tanks are expected to reach their full capacity of 1.37 million tons in early 2024. Japan announced its plan to discharge the treated water into the sea in 2018, asserting that the water would be further diluted by seawater prior to controlled release over several decades. This report includes contributions from Big Big News video journalist Yong Jun Chang. Table of Contents Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Fukushima wastewater protestsWhy were there protests in South Korea?Who is the head of the U.N. nuclear agency?What does the South Korean government say about the safety of the Japanese plans?What is the International Atomic Energy Agency’s view on the wastewater discharge plan?What alternative solutions were suggested by the protesters?More about Fukushima wastewater protests Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Fukushima wastewater protests Why were there protests in South Korea? There were protests in South Korea against Japan’s decision to release treated wastewater from the Fukushima nuclear power plant. Protesters demanded the abandonment of this plan, citing concerns for environmental and public health. Who is the head of the U.N. nuclear agency? The head of the U.N. nuclear agency, also known as the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), is Rafael Mariano Grossi. What does the South Korean government say about the safety of the Japanese plans? The South Korean government has officially endorsed the safety of the Japanese plans. They said the contamination levels of the water pumped out from the plant would be within acceptable standards and wouldn’t significantly affect South Korean seas as long as the plant’s treatment systems work as designed. What is the International Atomic Energy Agency’s view on the wastewater discharge plan? The International Atomic Energy Agency has approved the Japanese wastewater disposal plan, saying the treated wastewater would meet international safety standards and have a negligible impact on the environment and health. What alternative solutions were suggested by the protesters? Han Sang-jin, a spokesperson for the Korean Confederation of Trade Unions, suggested that instead of discharging the water into the sea, Japan could store the water on their land among other options. More about Fukushima wastewater protests The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster Fukushima wastewater disposal plan Japan’s Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Korean Confederation of Trade Unions You Might Be Interested In Majority of 2024 Republican Presidential Hopefuls Call for Order Following McCarthy’s Ouster A search is underway for missing submarine that takes people to see Titanic A 6-year-old said ‘I did it’ after shooting his teacher at Virginia school, warrants say The Impact of Pandemic Relief Spending on US Schools and Tech Companies Miami Mayor Francis Suarez Making History with Presidential Bid Ukrainian Military Retakes Eastern Village in Strategic Counterattack Fukushima wastewaterGeneral NewsIAEAJapan governmentSeoulSouth KoreaSouth Korea government Share 0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail Michael Nguyen Follow Author Michael Nguyen is a sports journalist who covers the latest news and developments in the world of sports. He has a particular interest in football and basketball, and he enjoys analyzing game strategies and player performance. previous post UN Technology Agency Presents Humanoid Robots for Q&A Session at Geneva News Conference next post Bob Huggins says he never resigned as West Virginia’s coach and wants his job back, attorney claims You may also like Bookmark A woman who burned Wyoming’s only full-service abortion... December 28, 2023 Bookmark Argument over Christmas gifts turns deadly as 14-year-old... December 28, 2023 Bookmark Danny Masterson sent to state prison to serve... December 28, 2023 Bookmark Hong Kong man jailed for 6 years after... December 28, 2023 Bookmark AP concludes at least hundreds died in floods... December 28, 2023 Bookmark Live updates | Israeli forces raid a West... December 28, 2023 6 comments MisoMochi July 9, 2023 - 5:19 am i hope they’ve really thought this through. doesn’t seem right to me, but i’m not a scientist. Reply KimJoon87 July 9, 2023 - 7:51 am can’t believe they’re just gonna dump the water in the sea…what about the marine life, ever thought about that? Reply Sustainable_Seoul July 9, 2023 - 12:13 pm this is where we need international cooperation! environment matters cant be decided individually. Its our planet guys! Reply YunaPark July 9, 2023 - 2:36 pm japan should consider other options, why always the easy way out? we’re talking about radiation here!!! Reply OceanDefender July 9, 2023 - 4:29 pm this is outrageous!! we must protect our oceans. marine life could be severely affected by this. Reply LeeMinHoFan July 10, 2023 - 12:09 am isn’t the IAEA supposed to protect us from nuclear threats? smh. this doesn’t make sense at all… Reply Leave a Comment Cancel Reply Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Δ