“Debate Emerges in Uganda Over the Controversial Legacy of Idi Amin”

In Uganda, a contentious debate has ignited concerning the legacy of the late dictator Idi Amin, sparking discussions about whether he can be rehabilitated in history. This discourse continues to captivate the East African nation, even two decades after Amin’s demise, as some Ugandans seek to reevaluate his rule.

Idi Amin, who ascended to power through a military coup in 1971 and ruled until his ouster by exiled armed groups in 1979, passed away in Saudi Arabia in 2003. His passing garnered minimal attention within Uganda, reflecting the deeply tarnished nature of his legacy. Efforts by Amin’s supporters to repatriate his remains have been unsuccessful, underscoring the controversial nature of his rule.

Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni, who played a role in Amin’s removal with the support of Tanzanian troops, consistently dismisses Amin’s legacy and once referred to him as a “primitive dictator.” Notably, there are no monuments or streets named after Amin in the capital, Kampala.

However, some Ugandans are advocating for a reevaluation of Amin’s legacy, not to downplay his tyrannical rule but to shed light on any positive aspects, such as his purported commitment to local industries and African solidarity. This debate has gained momentum, particularly as many Ugandans are yearning for political change after nearly four decades of Museveni’s presidency, which began in 1986. Museveni has not indicated when he plans to retire.

The effort to memorialize Amin is led by a former lawmaker from Amin’s hometown, who contends that international reporters defamed Amin by occasionally disseminating false stories about him. He argues that Amin deserves a more balanced assessment. However, he faces resistance from those who believe Amin should simply be forgotten.

An attempt to organize an Amin memorial lecture in September was thwarted when the event did not receive approval from the education ministry. The former lawmaker leading the effort later sought support for the creation of an Idi Amin Memorial Institute, but Museveni rejected the idea, characterizing Amin’s rule as “clearly illegal.”

This decision has triggered pushback from Ugandans who draw parallels between Amin and Museveni. Both leaders came to power through force and have relied heavily on military authority to maintain their rule. Critics of Museveni cite issues such as corruption, misuse of public resources, police brutality, and limited space for government opponents, asserting that Museveni lacks the moral authority to judge Amin.

Joel Ssenyonyi, a lawmaker and spokesperson for the opposition National Unity Platform party, commented on the situation, stating, “Mr. Museveni thinks this country started with him and that he has performed miracles. Our past leaders made mistakes, without a doubt, which Museveni likes to capitalize on, but he has done worse.”

While Amin had a limited education and never claimed to be a democrat, Museveni has been in power for nearly four decades and is accused of consolidating power within various institutions.

In response to online criticism of Museveni’s directive, government spokesman Ofwono Opondo argued that a memorial to Amin may “glorify him but cannot undo his terrible deeds done in full view of many people, some still alive.”

Amin’s supporters and some academics point out that he played a role in acquiring and maintaining national assets, such as a railway service, a national carrier, and buildings housing Uganda’s foreign missions. They also argue that he promoted local talent in music and sports.

However, Amin’s crimes, including extrajudicial killings, forced disappearances, and public executions, are well-documented. Human Rights Watch estimates that between 100,000 and 500,000 people were killed during his rule.

Some of Amin’s actions drew international condemnation, such as the expulsion of tens of thousands of Asians in 1972, which led to economic chaos. Additionally, his involvement in the 1976 Entebbe Airport hijacking crisis further tarnished his reputation.

Despite Amin’s isolation in the international community at the time of his ouster, Museveni, a U.S. ally, maintains that Uganda would be economically stronger if Amin had never been president. Some Ugandans, however, argue that Museveni has had ample time to make his mark on the country.

The debate surrounding the proposed Amin institute underscores the polarization of Ugandans regarding Museveni’s rule, especially in light of concerns about forced disappearances, torture, extrajudicial killings, and detention without trial under his regime.

This ongoing discussion reflects the complex and divisive nature of historical legacies and their impact on contemporary politics in Uganda.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Idi Amin’s Legacy

More about Idi Amin’s Legacy

• Idi Amin: From brutal dictator to bizarre exile
• Uganda: Idi Amin Biography
• Yoweri Museveni: Uganda’s political survivor
• Human Rights Watch: Uganda
• Entebbe raid: The most audacious hostage rescue in history