Supreme Court Gives Green Light to Alabama Redistricting Focused on Enhanced Black Voter Representation

by Chloe Baker
Alabama Redistricting Supreme Court Decision

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court of the United States sanctioned the creation of a revised congressional map in Alabama aimed at bolstering representation for Black voters. This redrawing of electoral districts may also offer Democrats an advantage in their bid to seize control of the House of Representatives.

The bench of justices unanimously dismissed the appeal from the State of Alabama to maintain the existing Republican-crafted electoral lines, which had previously been ruled against by a lower court.

By not intervening in the matter, the Supreme Court permitted the ongoing efforts of a court-appointed special master, who had unveiled three alternative plans on Monday. Each of these alternatives aims to establish a second congressional district where Black residents constitute a majority or near-majority of the voting-age populace.

The impetus for revising Alabama’s congressional districts stems from a June Supreme Court ruling. The Court found that the map, which was shaped according to 2020 census data and employed in the 2022 midterm elections, weakened the electoral influence of Black Alabamians. Given that over a quarter of Alabama’s population is Black, the extant map featured only one majority-Black district among seven total districts.

Related Articles

  • Supreme Court to Determine if Alabama Can Delay New Congressional Map Drafting
  • Legal Challengers in Voting Rights Case Advocate for Dismissal of Alabama’s Updated Congressional Map
  • Discord Over Ideal District Shape as Alabama Hastens Congressional Redistricting

The creation of a second district with a Democratic-leaning, majority-Black voting population could potentially result in an additional Democrat securing a congressional seat. This comes at a crucial time, as Republicans currently maintain a precarious majority in the House of Representatives. Legal battles over redistricting are also underway in other states, including Georgia, Louisiana, and Texas.

In Alabama, racial factors markedly influence voting patterns; Black voters predominantly support Democratic candidates, whereas white voters generally lean Republican.

Evan Milligan, the lead complainant in the redistricting case, lauded the Supreme Court’s ruling as a “triumph for all citizens of Alabama,” stating that it moves the state closer to fair representation. Milligan affirmed the significance of the decision in a subsequent telephone interview.

The office of Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall has yet to offer any remarks on the judicial decision.

A trio of judges will conduct a hearing next week to assess the proposed plans submitted by Richard Allen, the legal counsel designated by the judges for this matter. Allen’s proposed plans would modify the boundaries of Congressional District 2, resulting in a Black voting-age population ranging between 48.5% and 50.1%. Such a demographic shift could potentially place the seat within Democratic reach.

Contrastingly, the district formulated by Republican legislators, which was unanimously rejected by the panel of judges, had a Black voting-age populace of just 39.9%. According to simulations executed by those opposing the Republican scheme, this would have perpetuated the election of predominantly white Republican candidates.

The judicial panel declared that Alabama lawmakers had willfully ignored their instructions to establish a second district where Black voters could have a meaningful impact on election outcomes.

Evan Milligan and other Black Alabamians had contended that Alabama’s altered congressional map still marginalized Black-preferred candidates, restricting them to only one district currently represented by Rep. Terri Sewell, the lone Democrat and sole Black member of Alabama’s congressional delegation.

“The prevailing map essentially diluted the value of Black votes in Alabama,” said Milligan, emphasizing the imperative to contest this issue.

Alabama had aimed to implement the newly drawn districts while appealing the lower court’s decision, but failed to convince the Supreme Court.

Despite losing by a narrow 5-4 margin in June, Alabama had pinned its hopes on persuading Justice Brett Kavanaugh to change his stance. The state’s legal documents frequently cited a separate opinion by Kavanaugh from June, indicating his potential receptiveness to Alabama’s arguments under specific circumstances. Borrowing language from Justice Clarence Thomas’ dissent, Kavanaugh asserted that although race-based redistricting might be permissible under the Voting Rights Act temporarily, such authority could not be indefinitely prolonged.

Contribution to this report was made by Big Big News writer Kim Chandler, reporting from Montgomery, Alabama.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Alabama Redistricting Supreme Court Decision

What is the significance of the Supreme Court’s decision on Alabama’s congressional map?

The Supreme Court’s decision is pivotal because it allows for the redrawing of Alabama’s congressional districts with the goal of increasing representation for Black voters. This could potentially shift the balance of power in favor of Democrats in a state where Republicans currently dominate.

Who is Evan Milligan and what role did he play in the case?

Evan Milligan is the lead plaintiff in the redistricting case. He praised the Supreme Court’s decision as a “triumph for all citizens of Alabama,” emphasizing that it brings the state closer to fair representation for all voters, particularly Black Alabamians.

What are the immediate steps following the Supreme Court’s decision?

A three-judge panel is set to hold a hearing next week to review proposed plans submitted by Richard Allen, the lawyer appointed for this matter. These plans aim to adjust the boundaries of Alabama’s Congressional District 2 to increase the percentage of Black voting-age residents, potentially making it more accessible for Democratic candidates.

How does the decision impact the national political landscape, particularly the House of Representatives?

The creation of another Democratic-leaning, majority-Black voting district in Alabama could result in an additional Democratic seat in the House of Representatives, which is significant given that Republicans currently hold a narrow majority.

Are there similar legal challenges in other states?

Yes, legal battles concerning redistricting and voting rights are also taking place in Georgia, Louisiana, and Texas. These disputes could have wider implications for the balance of power at both state and national levels.

What were Alabama’s intentions for appealing the lower court’s ruling?

Alabama aimed to implement the newly drawn districts while appealing the lower court’s decision to the Supreme Court. The state was particularly hopeful that Justice Brett Kavanaugh might be persuaded to change his earlier stance, thereby tilting the court’s decision in their favor.

How does the Supreme Court’s decision relate to the Voting Rights Act?

The decision aligns with the intent of the Voting Rights Act, which aims to prevent racial discrimination in voting. It allows for the redrawing of districts in a manner that could bolster the influence of Black voters, thereby addressing the dilution of Black voting power in Alabama’s previous map.

Was there any dissent among the Supreme Court justices regarding the decision?

No, the justices unanimously dismissed the State of Alabama’s appeal to retain the existing Republican-crafted electoral lines, thereby allowing the court-appointed special master’s work to continue.

What was the stance of Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall’s office?

As of the latest reports, the office of Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall has not issued any comments regarding the Supreme Court’s decision.

More about Alabama Redistricting Supreme Court Decision

  • Supreme Court Ruling on Alabama Redistricting
  • Overview of the Voting Rights Act
  • Current Composition of the House of Representatives
  • Legal Challenges in Georgia, Louisiana, and Texas
  • The Role of Special Masters in Redistricting Cases
  • Profile of Evan Milligan, Lead Plaintiff
  • Prior Opinions by Justice Brett Kavanaugh on Redistricting
  • The Demographics of Alabama According to the 2020 Census
  • Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall’s Office
  • Historical Context of Redistricting and Racial Representation

You may also like


Karen White September 26, 2023 - 6:07 pm

The unanimous decision by the justices is telling. Seems like they’re sending a clear message here. But whats the next move for Alabama? Any ideas?

John Smith September 26, 2023 - 8:21 pm

Wow, didn’t see that coming. Huge news for Alabama and potentially for the whole country. This could really change the game for Democrats, couldn’t it?

Emily Johnson September 27, 2023 - 1:20 am

This is a big win for representation! Finally, the courts are stepping up to make sure everyone’s voice is heard. Its about time.

Mike Roberts September 27, 2023 - 2:29 am

Evan Milligan’s comment caught my eye. “Triumph for all citizens of Alabama,” he said. I hope he’s right, and that this sets a precedent for other states too.

Paul Williams September 27, 2023 - 3:23 am

really? I’m skeptical. Haven’t we seen this kinda stuff before, promises made and then broken? Guess we’ll have to wait and see how it actually plays out.

Nancy Lewis September 27, 2023 - 5:07 am

Given the razor-thin majority in the House, even one additional Democratic seat could make a difference. This is political dynamite!

William Clark September 27, 2023 - 6:12 am

I find the bit about Kavanaugh interesting. He might be the wild card in future cases related to redistricting. Gonna keep an eye on that.

Sandra Davis September 27, 2023 - 6:39 am

im not well-versed in politics, but even I can see this is important. Wonder what the Alabama Attorney General will say about this, any updates?


Leave a Comment


BNB – Big Big News is a news portal that offers the latest news from around the world. BNB – Big Big News focuses on providing readers with the most up-to-date information from the U.S. and abroad, covering a wide range of topics, including politics, sports, entertainment, business, health, and more.

Editors' Picks

Latest News

© 2023 BBN – Big Big News