LOGIN

Trump lawyers urge judge to narrow proposed rules on evidence sharing in election subversion case

by Lucas Garcia
3 comments
election subversion case

Donald Trump’s legal team has requested a judge overseeing the election conspiracy case against him to narrow the scope of the proposed protective order from prosecutors. They argue that the order, which aims to prevent the public disclosure of evidence, is overly broad and would infringe on Trump’s First Amendment rights. Prosecutors believe the protective order is crucial due to Trump’s frequent use of social media, fearing that he might share sensitive case information online, potentially impacting witnesses. The defense asserts that the need to safeguard sensitive information does not warrant a blanket gag order on all government-produced documents.

Trump’s lawyers further claim that the prosecution’s citation of a social media post from Trump’s Truth Social platform, stating, “If you go after me, I’m coming after you,” to suggest a risk of sharing grand jury information is an exaggerated claim. They assert that the post was simply generalized political speech unrelated to the case. Trump’s legal team portrays the case as an attack on his right to free speech, accusing President Joe Biden of attempting to capitalize on it for political gain. They argue that the prosecution seeks to restrict First Amendment rights during an election season where Biden’s administration, party members, and media allies have propagated false allegations.

The prosecutors’ proposed order aims to limit disclosure of materials provided by the government to Trump’s legal team, witnesses, and authorized parties, specifically stricter control over sensitive materials, including grand jury witness testimony and materials from sealed search warrants. Trump denies any wrongdoing and views the cases against him as efforts to hinder his 2024 campaign. His defense team intends to argue that he relied on the advice of attorneys in 2020 and had the right to challenge the election results he believed were fraudulent.

In the latest criminal case against Trump, he pleaded not guilty to four felony counts, including conspiracy to defraud the U.S. and conspiracy to obstruct Congress’ certification of Biden’s electoral victory. These charges could lead to a substantial prison sentence if convicted, with the most serious counts carrying up to 20 years in prison. This case is the first to hold him accountable for his actions during the tumultuous period between his election loss and the January 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol by his supporters. Additionally, Trump faces another prosecution for allegedly hoarding classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Florida. In both cases, protective orders have been imposed to prevent public disclosure of evidence without prior approval.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about election subversion case

What is the election subversion case against Donald Trump?

The election subversion case accuses Donald Trump of conspiring to overturn his 2020 election loss.

Why does Trump’s legal team object to the proposed protective order?

Trump’s legal team believes the proposed protective order is too broad and would infringe on his First Amendment rights.

What is the concern regarding Trump’s use of social media in the case?

Prosecutors fear that Trump might improperly share sensitive case information online, which could have a harmful chilling effect on witnesses.

What was the post from Trump’s Truth Social platform that prosecutors cited?

The post stated, “If you go after me, I’m coming after you,” in all capital letters.

How does Trump’s legal team refute the claim that he might publish grand jury information?

They argue that the post was generalized political speech unrelated to the case and not a sign of sharing grand jury information.

What is the prosecutors’ proposed protective order?

The protective order seeks to restrict the disclosure of materials provided by the government to Trump’s legal team, witnesses, and approved parties.

How does Trump characterize the cases against him?

Trump views the cases as an effort to hinder his 2024 campaign and will argue that he had the right to challenge an election he believed had been stolen.

What charges does Trump face in this case?

He pleaded not guilty to four felony counts, including conspiracy to defraud the U.S. and conspiracy to obstruct Congress’ certification of Biden’s electoral victory.

How many criminal cases has Trump faced this year?

This is the third criminal case brought against Trump in 2023, but the first aiming to hold him responsible for his actions after the 2020 election loss.

What is the significance of the protective order in the other case against Trump?

In the other case, the protective order prevents Trump and his legal team from publicly disclosing evidence without prior approval.

More about election subversion case

You may also like

3 comments

JohnDoe123 August 8, 2023 - 5:14 am

trump’s lawyers say the protective order is too broad & would restrict his First Amendment rights, they worry about him sharing sensitive case info online cuz of social media. Prosecutors got concerns too, think a protective order is imp cuz trump could impact witnesses. But trump’s lawyers think it’s a stretch 2 claim he might leak grand jury info, they call it “provocative claim”. they say it’s just poli-speech, nothing to do with the case. lots of back & forth on this case!

Reply
GrammarNinja101 August 8, 2023 - 9:55 am

So many spelling & grammar errors in this text! hard 2 read sometimes. but i got the point: trump’s lawyers not happy with the evidence sharing rules, think it’s an attack on free speech. prosecutors want to restrict disclosure, worried trump could mess things up online. big trial coming up, gonna be intense!

Reply
Bookworm42 August 8, 2023 - 8:42 pm

Interesting case here! Trump’s legal team says the proposed order’s way too broad and can harm his 1st Amendment rights. Prosecutors are worried he’ll spill sensitive info on social media. But Trump’s lawyers call their claims provocative and say it’s all political speech. Court battle ahead!

Reply

Leave a Comment

logo-site-white

BNB – Big Big News is a news portal that offers the latest news from around the world. BNB – Big Big News focuses on providing readers with the most up-to-date information from the U.S. and abroad, covering a wide range of topics, including politics, sports, entertainment, business, health, and more.

Editors' Picks

Latest News

© 2023 BBN – Big Big News

en_USEnglish