Trump joins media outlets in pushing for his federal election interference case to be televised

Donald Trump is advocating for the televising of his federal election interference trial in Washington, aligning himself with media outlets that argue the American public should have the opportunity to witness this historic case. Federal court regulations traditionally prohibit the broadcasting of court proceedings, yet The Big Big News and other news organizations contend that the exceptional nature of a former president standing trial for allegations of attempting to undermine the voters’ will justifies an exception to this rule.

The Justice Department, however, opposes this effort, asserting that the presiding judge lacks the authority to override the long-established nationwide policy against cameras in federal courtrooms. The trial is scheduled to commence on March 4.

In a statement made during a presidential campaign event in New Hampshire, Trump expressed his desire for global visibility of the trial, contrasting it with what he perceives as the prosecution’s intention to keep it concealed. Trump’s legal team, in court documents filed on Friday, emphasized the importance of allowing all Americans to observe what they view as a politically motivated prosecution of the leading candidate for the Republican party’s 2024 nomination. They also suggested that Trump might use the trial as a platform to reiterate his unsubstantiated claims of election fraud in the 2020 election, which he lost to Democrat Joe Biden. Trump has entered a plea of not guilty.

Trump’s lawyers assert, “President Trump absolutely agrees, and in fact demands, that these proceedings should be fully televised so that the American public can see firsthand that this case, just like others, is nothing more than a dreamt-up unconstitutional charade that should never be allowed to happen again.”

The request for a televised trial comes as the Washington case poses a significant legal threat to Trump’s political future. He is accused of engaging in illegal activities to overturn the election results leading up to the violent Capitol riot on January 6, 2021, incited by his supporters.

Despite Trump’s repeated efforts to postpone the trial until after the 2024 election, U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, a nominee of Democratic President Barack Obama, appears resolute in keeping it on schedule.

In a separate development in Florida, U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, overseeing the prosecution of Trump involving classified documents, extended multiple deadlines, making it highly improbable that the case will proceed to trial in May, as initially planned. Trump is facing numerous felony counts under the Espionage Act in this case and has pleaded not guilty.

Media outlets argue that a lack of transparency can erode trust in the legal system, especially in a case where a significant portion of the electorate continues to believe in election fraud. They believe that allowing access to the trial’s events, even years after its conclusion, would be invaluable for future journalists and historians in accurately analyzing this unique chapter of American history.

While some state courts permit cameras in the courtroom, the public has been able to watch proceedings related to the Georgia election case against Trump and 18 co-defendants. Photographers have been allowed to capture images of Trump during his civil fraud trial in New York, although it has not been televised.

The Justice Department has expressed concerns that the presence of cameras in the courtroom can influence lawyers and witnesses and potentially lead to grandstanding. They also worry about witnesses being harassed or threatened on social media, as images captured on video persist indefinitely.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, federal courts temporarily eased their rules, allowing the public to participate in proceedings via telephone or videoconference. The U.S. Supreme Court has continued to provide a live audio feed of its arguments since the pandemic began.

In September, the policymaking body of the federal courts introduced a new policy allowing judges to provide live audio access to nontrial proceedings in civil and bankruptcy cases, but this policy does not apply to criminal cases.

Media outlets had previously requested revisions to the rules to permit broadcasting in cases with extraordinary public interest. While a subcommittee has been established to study this issue, it is unlikely that any rule changes will be implemented before Trump’s trial.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Trump trial transparency

More about Trump trial transparency

• Donald Trump Pushes for Televised Trial
• Media Outlets Advocate Transparency in Trump Trial
• Justice Department’s Opposition to Televised Trial
• Allegations Against Donald Trump in the Trial
• Trial Schedule and Judge’s Determination
• Concerns About Witnesses in a Televised Trial
• COVID-19 Pandemic Impact on Court Proceedings
• Previous Requests for Broadcasting Court Proceedings