Title: The Dash for Cash: College Football’s Consolidation Threatens Stability

In the ever-evolving landscape of college football, the recent changes should not be labeled as mere conference realignment, but rather as a process of consolidation. As history has shown, no school is entirely safe from being squeezed out in the pursuit of financial gains.

The landscape of major college football conferences has witnessed significant shifts. Once known as the Big Six, the Power Five conferences have now been reduced to four. The Big 12 and Big Ten, motivated by dwindling television network revenues, recently dismantled the Pac-12 in a swift and decisive manner.

This consolidation trend is not new; it dates back to the days before the College Football Playoff emerged in 2014 when a power conference disappeared from college football. The Atlantic Coast Conference (ACC) played a significant role in this pattern by poaching teams like Miami, Boston College, and Virginia Tech from the Big East in 2003.

This cycle of change, driven by financial motivations, has left former Big East Commissioner Mike Tranghese, who successfully navigated the Big East through similar challenges, disillusioned. He observes a lack of hesitancy in the constant movement and realignment, leading to total chaos in the college football landscape.

Television networks play a pivotal role in this process, realizing the value of certain teams over others. As the networks have limited resources to allocate, they focus on acquiring the most prominent and revenue-generating schools, leaving others at a disadvantage.

The current realignment drama raises concerns about the future of college sports and its governing body, the NCAA. While the NCAA is preoccupied with issues like regulating athlete compensation, the conferences are engaged in a fierce race to secure their positions and maximize financial gains.

The next phase of realignment seems inevitable, with the ACC potentially facing significant challenges, despite contractual obligations protecting it for now. The potential future scenario involves the SEC and Big Ten targeting the most valuable parts of the ACC and the Big 12, leaving them to pick through what remains.

The question remains: where does this end? When will networks decide to stop funding less lucrative programs to support the powerhouses that generate higher ratings and revenues?

Amidst the fervor of realignment, college athletes now have more freedom to choose their destinations and monetize their fame, resulting in the transfer portal becoming a contentious issue.

Though some coaches voice concerns about the increasing hardships faced by athletes, the reality is that college sports operate within a system driven by financial interests, with schools and coaches often prioritizing lucrative opportunities over other considerations.

As college football undergoes this transformative phase, everyone involved bears some responsibility for the current state of affairs. With the dash for cash taking precedence, stability and tradition become secondary concerns in the ever-changing landscape of college football.

Follow Ralph D. Russo on Twitter at https://twitter.com/ralphDrussoAP and listen to his podcast at http://www.appodcasts.com.

For more college football news, visit https://bigbignews.net/college-football.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Consolidation

More about Consolidation

• AP College Football
• Ralph D. Russo’s Twitter
• Ralph D. Russo’s Podcast