Spread of Misinformation Precedes Ohio Abortion Referendum: Official Legislative Website Implicated

by Gabriel Martinez
Ohio abortion referendum

Controversial language focusing on a reproductive rights initiative on Ohio’s upcoming ballot is the kind of rhetoric that typically surfaces in the final stages of a hotly debated campaign. The language warns of unrestricted abortion access or the termination of fully conscious fetuses should the measure pass.

Remarkably, this messaging is not solely emanating from anti-abortion organizations opposing the constitutional amendment. The official government site of the Republican-majority Ohio Senate is also disseminating this information.

Due to its status as a government website, the content is given prominence in internet searches related to Issue 1. This is the referendum question that Ohio voters will consider on November 7, which aims to secure abortion rights within the state Constitution.

The Ohio Senate website hosts an “On The Record” blog, portrayed as an “online newsroom” that offers “views not covered in the news.” The blog features critical posts against Ohio media outlets, opinion pieces by Republican state senators, and content created by the Senate majority’s communication team and other prominent conservatives.

Upon the blog’s launch in September, Republican lawmakers assured visitors that they would find “a repository for facts, values, and rational discourse,” shortly after voters turned down a Republican-led attempt to tighten the rules for constitutional amendments.

Proponents of the proposed amendment criticize the utilization of a taxpayer-funded platform for such purposes, while experts in online misinformation describe the Republican lawmakers’ actions as unprecedented.

Laura Manley, executive director of the Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy at Harvard Kennedy School, commented that this strategy cleverly disguises partisan views as neutral and factual information, calling it “ingenious in a particularly cunning manner.”

Recently, “On The Record” has shifted its focus towards opposing Issue 1, making claims in articles that the measure would allow unrestricted abortions and the termination of fully conscious fetuses. Legal and medical professionals consulted by The Big Big News have dismissed these narratives as either misleading or entirely false.

Although the Ohio Senate is a governmental body, supporters of the constitutional amendment fear that content from “On The Record” could mislead voters into thinking it provides objective information. Google’s search algorithms often prioritize government websites, assuming that they offer reliable, verifiable, and authoritative content for public benefit.

Democratic state Senator Bill DeMora stated that the content is not picked up by mainstream media due to its inaccuracy, while Republican Senate President Matt Huffman refrained from labeling “On The Record” as a news service, describing it as a method of public communication.

John Fortney, spokesperson for the Republican majority in the Ohio Senate, stated that the blog does not incur any additional costs, as it is hosted on an existing platform and managed by his staff. However, public records reveal that Fortney and his senior press secretary earn a combined annual salary of $195,000. The blog is maintained by Legislative Information Services, an IT office for Ohio’s legislative chambers, with an annual budget of $13 million.

An in-depth analysis by supporters of the amendment shows no discernable difference between the blog and the Senate’s official site, indicating shared resources.

Google has not responded to queries about its search algorithms giving precedence to such content, but groups fighting misinformation about Issue 1 say that the blog’s government-backed status gives it an unfair advantage in search results.

Critics argue that the blog blurs the line between government responsibility and partisan advocacy, putting the integrity of the referendum at risk by presenting biased information on an official platform designed to inform voters.

The Big Big News is funded by multiple private foundations for the purpose of enhancing its coverage of elections and democracy, and is solely responsible for all content. Reporters Fernando from Chicago and Samantha Hendrickson from Columbus contributed to this report.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Ohio abortion referendum

What is the main issue discussed in the article?

The article discusses the dissemination of misleading information concerning an upcoming abortion referendum in Ohio. The official website of the Republican-majority Ohio Senate is implicated for hosting a blog that presents partisan views as neutral information.

Who are the main entities involved?

The main entities involved are the Ohio Senate, specifically its Republican majority, and various experts and critics who argue that the Senate’s actions are a misuse of a government platform. Proponents and opponents of the abortion amendment, as well as Google, are also mentioned.

What is “On The Record”?

“On The Record” is a blog hosted on the Ohio Senate’s official website. It is portrayed as an online newsroom that provides viewpoints not covered in traditional news outlets. The blog has been criticized for publishing misleading or false information about the abortion referendum, known as Issue 1.

Why is the source of the information significant?

The source is significant because it is an official government website, which generally carries more weight in search algorithms and is often considered a reliable source of information by the public.

What are the implications of this issue?

The implications are multi-faceted. On one hand, there’s concern that voters might be misled by information that appears to be objective due to its source. On the other hand, the use of a taxpayer-funded platform for partisan advocacy is also under scrutiny.

What do critics say about the use of the blog on a government website?

Critics argue that hosting such a blog on a government website blurs the line between official responsibilities and partisan advocacy. It jeopardizes the integrity of the referendum by presenting biased information as though it were impartial.

How has Google’s search algorithm affected the situation?

Google’s search algorithm often prioritizes content from government websites, assuming it to be trustworthy and authoritative. This gives the misleading information an unfair advantage in search results, according to critics.

What measures are being taken to counter the misleading information?

Groups that support the abortion amendment are trying to counter the misinformation by producing their own content. However, the weight given to government websites in search results makes this task challenging.

Are there any legal ramifications being considered?

The article does not explicitly state that legal action is being considered, but it does mention that Democratic lawmakers are exploring whether they can launch their own version of a blog to counter the GOP’s narrative.

Who conducted the analysis of “On The Record”?

A detailed analysis of “On The Record” was performed by a group that supports the constitutional amendment on abortion rights in Ohio. The analysis found no distinguishable difference between the blog and the Senate’s official site.

More about Ohio abortion referendum

  • Ohio Senate Official Website
  • Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy at the Harvard Kennedy School
  • Google’s Search Quality Evaluator Guidelines
  • The Big Big News Democracy Initiative
  • Buckeye Institute Public Salary Database
  • University of California, Davis School of Law
  • Red Wine & Blue Women’s Organization

You may also like


CryptoQueen October 28, 2023 - 4:15 am

Seriously? A govt website spreading false info about a major social issue? Makes you wonder how deep the rabbit hole goes.

FinanceGuru October 28, 2023 - 5:36 am

Ethics in government? Clearly not a priority here. Misleading voters through an official platform is outrageous!

Sarah_Momof2 October 28, 2023 - 1:40 pm

As a mom, this worries me. We should be able to trust govt websites to give us the straight facts, especially on something as important as abortion rights.

TechSavvy October 28, 2023 - 4:28 pm

Why is Google prioritizing this? Shouldn’t their algorithm be smart enough to filter out misleading info?

JohnDoe123 October 29, 2023 - 12:14 am

Wow, I can’t believe what the Ohio Senate is up to. Is this even legal? Blurring the lines between government and partisanship is bad news.

MikeInOhio October 29, 2023 - 3:26 am

Been following this Issue 1 very closely and its disappointing to see the Senate involved like this. So much for unbiased info.

PoliticalJunkie October 29, 2023 - 3:28 am

If the other side did this, there’d be a huge uproar. Double standards much?

ConcernedCitizen October 29, 2023 - 3:51 am

we need to hold our gov accountable. This is taxpayer money supporting a blog with misleading information, not okay!


Leave a Comment


BNB – Big Big News is a news portal that offers the latest news from around the world. BNB – Big Big News focuses on providing readers with the most up-to-date information from the U.S. and abroad, covering a wide range of topics, including politics, sports, entertainment, business, health, and more.

Editors' Picks

Latest News

© 2023 BBN – Big Big News