LOGIN

South African Olympic runner Oscar Pistorius granted parole 10 years after killing his girlfriend

by Chloe Baker
5 comments
Oscar Pistorius Parole

South African double-amputee Olympic runner Oscar Pistorius has been granted parole, marking a significant development in a case that has captured global attention for a decade. Pistorius, who was convicted of the murder of model Reeva Steenkamp in a tragic incident that occurred on Valentine’s Day in 2013, will be released from prison on January 5, 10 years after the fateful event.

The Department of Corrections spokesperson, Singabakho Nxumalo, has outlined the conditions of Pistorius’ parole. He will be required to remain in the area of Pretoria, where he is set to live, without leaving unless authorized by authorities. Additionally, Pistorius will undergo a program aimed at addressing his anger issues, and he will be obligated to perform community service. These parole conditions are set to be in effect for a duration of five years.

It is crucial to emphasize that parole, in this context, does not signify the conclusion of Pistorius’ sentence; rather, it signifies a transition from a correctional facility to completing the remainder of his sentence in the community. Serious offenders in South Africa must serve at least half of their sentence before becoming eligible for parole, a requirement that Pistorius has fulfilled.

Oscar Pistorius, who recently turned 37, was at the pinnacle of his athletic career and was globally admired when the tragic shooting took place. He fired multiple shots through the bathroom door of his Pretoria villa, using his licensed 9mm pistol, resulting in the loss of Reeva Steenkamp’s life.

This recent parole hearing was Pistorius’ second attempt within eight months, as he was previously ruled ineligible for early release due to a procedural error related to the starting date of his sentence. Initially convicted of culpable homicide, equivalent to manslaughter, his conviction was later upgraded to murder after prosecutors appealed the decision. Subsequently, Pistorius received a sentence of 13 years and five months in prison.

At his murder trial, Pistorius claimed that he had mistaken Steenkamp for an intruder in his bathroom, while prosecutors contended that she had sought refuge there during a heated argument, and Pistorius had acted recklessly. Ultimately, he was convicted of murder on the principle of dolus eventualis, which implies extreme recklessness resulting in the likely death of the person behind the door.

While Oscar Pistorius prepares to reenter society under parole, he is expected to reside at his uncle’s opulent residence in an affluent Pretoria suburb, where he stayed during his trial. This development marks the latest chapter in a case that has raised profound questions about justice, fame, and the consequences of one fateful night.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Parole

What is the background of the Oscar Pistorius case?

Oscar Pistorius, a double-amputee Olympic runner, was convicted of the murder of his girlfriend, Reeva Steenkamp, on Valentine’s Day in 2013. He shot her through a bathroom door at his home in Pretoria, South Africa, with his licensed 9mm pistol.

Why was Oscar Pistorius granted parole?

Oscar Pistorius was granted parole after serving 10 years of his sentence, which is a requirement for serious offenders in South Africa to become eligible for parole. His parole comes with conditions, including not leaving the Pretoria area, attending anger management programs, and performing community service.

What is the significance of parole in this case?

Parole doesn’t mark the end of Pistorius’ sentence but signifies a transition from a correctional facility to completing the remainder of his sentence in the community. It raises questions about justice, rehabilitation, and the consequences of his actions.

What led to the upgrade of Pistorius’s conviction from culpable homicide to murder?

Pistorius was initially convicted of culpable homicide, a charge comparable to manslaughter. However, prosecutors successfully appealed this decision, leading to his conviction being upgraded to murder. They argued that Pistorius acted with extreme recklessness, knowing that his actions could result in death.

What were some key points of contention during the trial?

The key points of contention revolved around whether Pistorius genuinely mistook Steenkamp for an intruder or whether he acted recklessly in a fit of rage. The legal principle of “dolus eventualis” played a pivotal role in the case, indicating that Pistorius should have known that his actions might lead to a fatality.

How has this case impacted discussions on justice and fame?

The Oscar Pistorius case has sparked widespread debate on issues of justice, fame, and the consequences of one’s actions. It highlights the complexities of high-profile cases and the scrutiny they undergo in the public eye.

More about Parole

You may also like

5 comments

JohnDoe98 November 24, 2023 - 10:24 pm

oscar pistorius case been so long, finally out on parole. interesting story bout justice n fame

Reply
GrammarGeek November 24, 2023 - 11:17 pm

Need more info bout dolus eventualis, legal stuff complicated

Reply
SocialObserver November 25, 2023 - 5:54 am

case makes you think bout justice, consequences, high-profile trials, sad story

Reply
NewsJunkie45 November 25, 2023 - 5:57 am

wow, parole after 10 years, how he get out? murder case so confusin

Reply
SportsFanatic November 25, 2023 - 6:18 am

oscar pistorius was a famous athlete, now parole, crazy journey

Reply

Leave a Comment

BNB – Big Big News is a news portal that offers the latest news from around the world. BNB – Big Big News focuses on providing readers with the most up-to-date information from the U.S. and abroad, covering a wide range of topics, including politics, sports, entertainment, business, health, and more.

Editors' Picks

Latest News