LOGIN

Prosecutors in Brazil halt zipline project at Rio’s renowned Sugarloaf Mountain

by Chloe Baker
6 comments
zipline construction at Sugarloaf Mountain

Prosecutors in Brazil block zipline construction at Rio’s iconic Sugarloaf Mountain

Brazil’s federal prosecutors have successfully halted the authorization for the installation of ziplines at Sugarloaf Mountain in Rio de Janeiro. The decision came in response to concerns raised by prosecutors that the project would cause environmental damage to the surrounding area, which is a UNESCO world heritage site. The prosecutors argued that the project had been “illicitly” approved by the federal agency Iphan, after construction had already commenced in September 2022. As a result, both Iphan and the company responsible for the zipline construction now face a civil lawsuit and are required to pay a fine of at least $9.5 million (50 million reais). The company has been given a 60-day deadline to present a plan for repairing the damaged area and to remove all structures and residue from the construction site.

Sugarloaf Mountain, known as Pão de Açúcar in Portuguese, is a prominent landmark at the entrance to Rio’s bay. It was designated as a World Heritage Site by the United Nations in 2012 and recognized as a national monument by Brazil’s heritage institute years earlier. The mountain’s cable cars, offering breathtaking panoramic views of the city’s beaches and forested mountains, attract hundreds of thousands of tourists each year.

Protests against the zipline construction began in March, with around 200 people gathering beneath Sugarloaf Mountain to express their opposition. Concerns were raised about the project’s potential negative environmental impact, and an online petition to stop the work garnered nearly 11,000 signatures. The proposed ziplines, consisting of four steel lines spanning 755 meters (approximately 2,500 feet) over the forest between Sugarloaf and Urca Hill, would allow riders to reach speeds of up to 100 kph (62 mph). The inauguration was planned for the latter half of this year.

The area surrounding Sugarloaf Mountain is also popular for activities such as sport climbing and birdwatching, with the preserved Atlantic Forest providing a scenic backdrop. The prospect of zipline riders whizzing through the area raised concerns among mountaineers, environmental activists, and residents alike, who feared the potential impact on the environment. There were also warnings that UNESCO might revoke the site’s heritage status.

The prosecutors’ decision came as a result of a public interest civil action lawsuit filed by Brazilian citizens, seeking to protect the environment and preserve the historical and cultural heritage of Sugarloaf Mountain. The prosecutors also discovered that the zipline construction had caused alterations to the natural landscape due to rock demolition and drilling.

Parque Bondinho Pão de Açúcar, the company operating the cable cars and leading the 50-million reais ($9.5-million) zipline project, stated that sound tests indicated that noise from the riders would not be perceptible from below and would not affect climbing routes. The company claimed to have obtained all the necessary permits and licenses for the project, including those from the National Heritage Institute and municipal authorities. They also argued that the project had the potential to boost tourism in the area, providing visitors with an enhanced experience at Parque Bondinho Pão de Açúcar Park.

Opponents of the zipline project have dubbed it “the castle of horrors” and expressed concerns about potential future interventions.

FAQ about zipline construction at Sugarloaf Mountain

What is the reason behind Brazil’s prosecutors blocking the zipline construction at Sugarloaf Mountain?

Brazil’s prosecutors blocked the zipline construction at Sugarloaf Mountain due to concerns about the potential environmental damage it could cause to the surrounding area, which is a UNESCO world heritage site. They argued that the project was authorized without proper procedures and after construction had already begun.

What actions have the prosecutors taken against the zipline construction?

The prosecutors have filed a civil lawsuit against both the federal agency Iphan and the company responsible for the zipline construction. As a result, both parties are defendants in the lawsuit and are required to pay a fine of at least $9.5 million (50 million reais). The company has been given a deadline to repair the damaged area and remove all structures and residue from the construction site.

What are the concerns raised by opponents of the zipline project?

Opponents of the zipline project are concerned about its potential negative impact on the environment, as well as the disturbance it could cause to the preserved Atlantic Forest surrounding Sugarloaf Mountain. There are also worries that the project could lead to UNESCO revoking the heritage status of the site.

Is there any support for the zipline project?

Yes, there are supporters of the zipline project who argue that it could boost tourism in the area and provide visitors with a unique experience at Parque Bondinho Pão de Açúcar Park. The company operating the cable cars, which also leads the zipline project, claims to have obtained all the necessary permits and licenses for the construction.

What is the significance of Sugarloaf Mountain?

Sugarloaf Mountain, also known as Pão de Açúcar in Portuguese, is an iconic landmark in Rio de Janeiro. It is designated as a World Heritage Site by UNESCO and recognized as a national monument by Brazil’s heritage institute. The mountain’s cable cars attract a large number of tourists each year, offering breathtaking panoramic views of the city’s beaches and forested mountains.

More about zipline construction at Sugarloaf Mountain

You may also like

6 comments

Jane123 June 3, 2023 - 3:17 am

Wow, Brazil’s prosecutors did a gr8 job blocking the zipline construction at Sugarloaf Mountain! They’re worried about the environment and UNESCO heritage status, which is really important. Good on them!

Reply
TravelLover June 3, 2023 - 3:17 am

This is such a shame! I was really looking forward to experiencing the zipline at Sugarloaf Mountain. The prosecutors should consider the tourism and economic benefits it could bring. It’s a missed opportunity.

Reply
NatureProtector June 3, 2023 - 3:17 am

Kudos to the prosecutors for standing up against the zipline project! We need to preserve our natural heritage and protect the environment. It’s a win for nature and future generations.

Reply
AdventureSeeker June 3, 2023 - 3:17 am

I don’t understand what the big fuss is about! Ziplines can be a thrilling way to explore nature. I hope they find a compromise that satisfies both the need for adventure and the concerns for the environment.

Reply
LocalResident June 3, 2023 - 3:17 am

As a resident living near Sugarloaf Mountain, I’m relieved that the zipline construction is being blocked. The noise and disturbance it would cause are unacceptable. Our peace and tranquility should come first!

Reply
HistoryBuff June 3, 2023 - 3:17 am

It’s essential to protect the historical and cultural significance of Sugarloaf Mountain. I fully support the prosecutors’ decision to preserve our heritage and maintain the integrity of this iconic site.

Reply

Leave a Comment

BNB – Big Big News is a news portal that offers the latest news from around the world. BNB – Big Big News focuses on providing readers with the most up-to-date information from the U.S. and abroad, covering a wide range of topics, including politics, sports, entertainment, business, health, and more.

Editors' Picks

Latest News