Prosecutors Advocate for Single Trial of Trump and 18 Co-Defendants in Georgia Election Case, Citing Efficiency and Fairness

by Madison Thomas
Georgia election case

Prosecutors who allege that former President Donald Trump, along with 18 additional individuals, engaged in an unlawful effort to reverse the outcome of the 2020 Georgia election argue that a joint trial for all defendants would be the most efficient and equitable course of action. The charges were leveled under Georgia’s anti-racketeering legislation, making it likely that identical evidence and witness testimony would be presented in separate trials.

In a legal brief submitted this Tuesday, prosecutors emphasized that conducting multiple extended trials would impose a significant burden on the county superior court’s resources. They further argued that defendants tried in later cases could unfairly benefit by having prior access to the state’s evidence and legal strategy.

Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis had previously stated her preference for a single trial involving all 19 defendants. Two individuals among those charged—Kenneth Chesebro and Sidney Powell—have submitted requests for expedited trials. Judge Scott McAfee scheduled their trial for October 23 but expressed skepticism that all defendants could be tried by that date. He solicited a brief from Willis’ team elaborating on their rationale.

Chesebro faces charges related to orchestrating and implementing a strategy that aimed to have 16 Georgia Republicans falsely certify Trump as the winner, declaring themselves to be the legitimately elected electors of the state. Powell is charged with involvement in compromising election machinery in Coffee County.

While the majority of other defendants have petitioned for separate trials or smaller group trials, prosecutors observed that these individuals have not relinquished their right to request expedited trials. The cut-off date for such demands is November 5, and if met, it could instigate one or more trials during the subsequent two-month court term, beginning on November 6. Prosecutors contend that simultaneous high-profile trials could compromise security and place undue stress on witnesses and victims.

Prosecutors further stated that mandating defendants to forgo their right to a speedy trial to enable separate trials would avert the complex and burdensome scenario described, reduce risks of undue strain on witnesses and victims, and diminish tactical maneuvering. They also indicated that defendants who argue they cannot be prepared by October 23 must inform the court of their anticipated readiness date.

Some of the defendants are attempting to transfer their cases to federal jurisdiction. Lawyers for Trump indicated that he might also pursue this route. Judge McAfee expressed reservations about moving ahead with the state trial while such attempts are under consideration. However, prosecutors highlighted that existing law permits the state case to advance while the issue of federal jurisdiction remains unresolved.

Federal Judge Steve Jones recently denied an effort by Trump’s former White House Chief of Staff, Mark Meadows, to move his case to a federal venue, sending it back to the state court. Meadows is appealing this decision. Four other defendants who have signaled their intent to shift their cases to federal court are scheduled for hearings before Judge Jones next week.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Georgia election case

What is the main argument prosecutors are making for a joint trial?

Prosecutors are advocating for a single, joint trial for all 19 defendants, including former President Donald Trump, in the Georgia election case. They argue that a joint trial would be the most efficient and fair approach. According to a legal brief they filed, separate trials would place a considerable burden on the court’s resources and could give an unfair advantage to defendants tried at a later date.

Under what law are the charges being filed?

The charges are being filed under Georgia’s anti-racketeering law. This implies that the same set of evidence and witnesses would likely be applicable across separate trials for the defendants.

Who are the two defendants who have filed for speedy trials?

The two defendants who have filed for speedy trials are Kenneth Chesebro and Sidney Powell. Chesebro is accused of orchestrating a plan involving 16 Georgia Republicans to falsely declare Trump as the winner of the state’s electoral votes, while Powell is charged with compromising election equipment in Coffee County.

What is the deadline for defendants to file their own speedy trial demands?

The deadline for defendants to file their own demands for speedy trials is November 5. If met, this could trigger one or more trials during the two-month court term that begins on November 6.

Are any defendants seeking to move their cases to federal court?

Yes, five of the defendants are attempting to move their cases to federal jurisdiction. Lawyers for Donald Trump have also indicated that he may consider this course of action.

What concerns did Judge Scott McAfee express?

Judge Scott McAfee expressed skepticism that all 19 defendants could realistically be tried by the initially scheduled date of October 23. He has asked Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis to provide a brief explaining why a joint trial by that date is necessary.

What are the potential complications if separate trials proceed?

Prosecutors contend that separate trials could create security issues and place “unavoidable burdens” on witnesses and victims. It could also lead to multiple high-profile trials happening simultaneously, further straining judicial resources.

What happened to the attempt by Mark Meadows to move his case to federal court?

Federal Judge Steve Jones denied Mark Meadows’ attempt to move his case to federal court and sent it back to state jurisdiction. Meadows is currently appealing this decision.

More about Georgia election case

  • Georgia Anti-Racketeering Law
  • Fulton County District Attorney’s Office
  • Speedy Trial Demands in the U.S. Legal System
  • Federal vs. State Jurisdiction in the United States
  • Timeline of the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election in Georgia

You may also like


Greg P September 13, 2023 - 8:40 am

So if they file for speedy trials, does that mean we get a verdict by end of the year? kinda want this over with.

James D. September 13, 2023 - 11:25 am

Wow, things are heating up in this Georgia case. Can’t believe they wanna try Trump and all those folks together. Could be a game changer.

Tony_M September 13, 2023 - 12:02 pm

Wait, they’re saying multiple trials would be a burden but what about fairness? some of these guys may not even be connected, idk.

Vicky S September 13, 2023 - 2:06 pm

The deadline for speedy trials is Nov 5, mark your calendars. This is gonna get messy.

EmilyH September 13, 2023 - 8:21 pm

Can’t help but think what the implications will be for the bigger political landscape. This is huge.

SarahJ September 13, 2023 - 10:24 pm

What about the defendants rights here? If they want separate trials shouldn’t they get it? just asking.

BrianW September 14, 2023 - 12:31 am

anyone else confused by the legal jargon? Anti-racketeering law? That sounds heavy. gotta go look that up.

LenaQ September 14, 2023 - 1:05 am

Mark Meadows is appealing, huh? gonna be a long ride folks.

Sam_R September 14, 2023 - 2:13 am

Federal court or state court, that is the question. Wonder what the pros and cons are.

Melissa T September 14, 2023 - 3:47 am

Seriously, why aren’t more people talking about this! It’s like they’re setting up to put all the chips on the table for one big trial. High stakes!


Leave a Comment


BNB – Big Big News is a news portal that offers the latest news from around the world. BNB – Big Big News focuses on providing readers with the most up-to-date information from the U.S. and abroad, covering a wide range of topics, including politics, sports, entertainment, business, health, and more.

Editors' Picks

Latest News

© 2023 BBN – Big Big News