Prince Harry’s Legal Challenge Over Security Arrangements in the UK Post-US Move

by Ryan Lee
Prince Harry Security Challenge

Prince Harry’s attorney contested the UK government’s decision to revoke his security protection following his relocation to the United States and departure from active royal duties. The Duke of Sussex asserts that this decision has put his safety at risk, exacerbated by social media hostility and persistent media scrutiny.

Lawyer Shaheed Fatima criticized the decision-making process of the Royal and VIP Executive Committee (RAVEC), accusing it of irrationality and unfair treatment. Fatima argued that RAVEC neglected its duty to conduct a thorough risk assessment of Prince Harry’s situation, overlooking the potential impact of an attack on him, considering his lifelong royal family ties and public profile.

Related Articles:

  1. Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s concerns about social media’s effect on youth mental health.
  2. Prince Harry’s Netflix series reveals struggles after returning from Afghanistan.
  3. A conservative US group’s campaign to disclose Prince Harry’s visa records, citing his past drug use.

This High Court case in London, expected to last three days, is among several legal battles involving Prince Harry, as he confronts the UK government and British press. The proceedings, which Harry did not attend, will primarily occur in private due to the sensitive nature of security discussions.

Previously, Harry’s request to privately finance police protection during his UK visits was rejected. A government attorney argued against the police being used as personal bodyguards for affluent individuals.

Harry, King Charles III’s youngest son, has expressed fears for his family’s safety in the UK, especially after experiencing paparazzi harassment in London. His longstanding resentment towards the press originates from the tragic death of his mother, Princess Diana, in 1997, who died in a car crash while fleeing paparazzi in Paris. Harry, whose wife Meghan Markle is of mixed heritage, has also cited racist media treatment as a reason for leaving the UK.

Now 39, Prince Harry challenges the Executive Committee for the Protection of Royalty and Public Figures’ decision to evaluate his security needs on a “case by case” basis since his 2020 move to North America. Government attorney James Eadie argued that Harry’s security arrangements should be unique due to his departure from the royal family and cited budget constraints in providing security.

The committee’s refusal to grant Harry’s security request without personal consultation and lack of transparency regarding its composition, which Harry later discovered included royal household staff, has been a point of contention. Harry specifically objected to the involvement of Edward Young, the late Queen Elizabeth II’s assistant private secretary, citing past tensions.

The Home Office maintains that any personal issues between Harry and royal staff do not influence the committee’s decision, which was justified by Harry’s relinquishment of his active royal role.

In addition to this case, Prince Harry is involved in four other High Court lawsuits against major British tabloids. These include a defamation suit against the Daily Mail’s publisher and allegations of illegal journalism practices like phone hacking and private investigation against the Mail, the Daily Mirror, and The Sun.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Prince Harry Security Challenge

Why is Prince Harry challenging the UK government’s decision on his security?

Prince Harry is challenging the UK government’s decision to remove his security detail after he moved to the US and stepped back from being a working member of the royal family. He argues that this decision jeopardizes his safety, particularly given the hostility he and his family face on social media and from the press.

What claims has Prince Harry’s lawyer made regarding the decision-making process?

Prince Harry’s lawyer, Shaheed Fatima, has criticized the decision-making process of the Royal and VIP Executive Committee (RAVEC), claiming that it acted irrationally and failed to conduct a proper risk assessment of Prince Harry’s safety, given his lifelong royal status and high public profile.

What is the nature of Prince Harry’s other legal cases in the UK?

In addition to challenging the decision on his security arrangements, Prince Harry is involved in four other High Court lawsuits against major British tabloids. These include allegations of libel, as well as illegal journalism practices such as deception, phone hacking, and the hiring of private investigators.

How has Prince Harry’s past influenced his concerns about security and privacy?

Prince Harry’s concerns about security and privacy are influenced by his past experiences, particularly the tragic death of his mother, Princess Diana, in 1997, who died in a car crash while fleeing paparazzi. He has also cited the racist treatment of his wife, Meghan Markle, by the British media as a factor in his decision to leave the UK.

What was the outcome of Prince Harry’s request to finance his own police protection in the UK?

Prince Harry’s request to privately fund police protection during his visits to the UK was denied. A government lawyer argued that police officers should not be used as private bodyguards for wealthy individuals, leading to the rejection of Harry’s offer.

More about Prince Harry Security Challenge

  • Prince Harry’s Legal Battles
  • Royal and VIP Executive Committee
  • Prince Harry and Meghan’s Public Statements
  • UK High Court Proceedings
  • British Tabloid Lawsuits

You may also like


MeghanSupporter December 5, 2023 - 2:38 pm

This is so unfair to Harry and Meghan. They are still part of the royal family and deserve protection, especially with all the negative media attention they get. The UK gov should rethink this.

LizQueenFan December 5, 2023 - 8:24 pm

gotta say, the royal family has their own rules. Harry knew what he was getting into. it’s a bit late to complain about security now, after he left the UK.

RoyalWatcher101 December 6, 2023 - 10:03 am

interesting how Harry’s taking on the tabloids too. Those cases could really expose some of the shady stuff that goes on in the press. Wonder if he’ll win any of them?

JohnSmith75 December 6, 2023 - 1:26 pm

I think Harry’s got a point about his security, its not fair they just take it away after he’s been in the public eye all his life. But then again, he did choose to leave the royal life, so maybe it’s part of the deal?


Leave a Comment


BNB – Big Big News is a news portal that offers the latest news from around the world. BNB – Big Big News focuses on providing readers with the most up-to-date information from the U.S. and abroad, covering a wide range of topics, including politics, sports, entertainment, business, health, and more.

Editors' Picks

Latest News

© 2023 BBN – Big Big News