Prince Harry challenges the decision to strip him of security in Britain after he moved to US

by Ryan Lee
0 comment
Prince Harry Security Challenge

On Tuesday, Prince Harry’s legal representative challenged the British government’s decision to remove his security detail following his relocation to the United States and his step back from active royal duties.

The Duke of Sussex has expressed concerns for his safety, citing negative social media sentiments and persistent media scrutiny.

His lawyer, Shaheed Fatima, criticized the Royal and VIP Executive Committee (RAVEC) for not conducting a thorough risk assessment as per their guidelines, arguing that Harry’s unique position and lifelong royal status warrant special consideration for his security.

The lawyer emphasized the potential damage to the UK’s image in case of an attack on Harry, highlighting the necessity of reassessing his security needs.

In related news, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have spoken about the detrimental effects of social media on youth mental health. Harry has also shared his experiences of lacking support post-Afghanistan in a Netflix series. Additionally, a conservative US group has cited Harry’s past drug use in a request to release his visa records.

A three-day hearing at London’s High Court, involving multiple legal battles of Prince Harry against the UK government and British tabloids, is currently underway. Harry was absent from the opening remarks of the hearing, which is mostly conducted privately due to sensitive security discussions. The judge’s decision will be announced later.

Harry’s earlier request to pay for his security during UK visits was rejected, with a government lawyer stating police officers shouldn’t act as “private bodyguards for the wealthy.”

Harry, son of King Charles III, has voiced concerns about the safety of his wife Meghan Markle and their children in the UK. His distrust of the press dates back to his mother Princess Diana’s death in 1997, exacerbated by the media’s alleged racist attitudes and invasions of privacy.

The prince, now 39, residing in California, challenges the decision to provide him security on a “case by case” basis. Government attorney James Eadie argues that Harry’s altered royal status affects his security entitlement, also citing budget constraints.

Harry contends the committee’s decision was made without his input and lacked transparency. He points out conflicts of interest, particularly involving Edward Young, Queen Elizabeth II’s former assistant private secretary.

The Home Office dismisses any relevance of tensions between Harry and royal staff to the committee’s decision, upholding its right to make such determinations given Harry’s relinquished royal role.

This case is among five pending lawsuits Harry has in the High Court, including libel and unlawful journalism practices against major British tabloids.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Prince Harry Security Challenge

What is the main issue Prince Harry is challenging in this text?

Prince Harry is challenging the British government’s decision to strip him of his security detail after he moved to the United States and stepped back from his role as a working member of the royal family.

Why does Prince Harry believe his safety is at risk?

He believes his safety is jeopardized due to hostility on social media and relentless media attention. He also cites concerns about the impact on his safety stemming from his status within the royal family.

What is the role of the Royal and VIP Executive Committee (RAVEC) in this matter?

RAVEC evaluated Prince Harry’s security needs, but his lawyer argues that they acted irrationally and unfairly by not following their own policies and not considering the potential impact of an attack on his safety and the UK’s reputation.

What legal battles is Prince Harry currently involved in?

Prince Harry is engaged in multiple legal battles against the UK government and British tabloids. These include the security matter discussed here, as well as cases related to libel and unlawful journalism practices by major British tabloids.

What was the outcome of his earlier request to privately pay for London’s police force for security?

His request was denied earlier in the year. The judge ruled against using police officers as “private bodyguards for the wealthy.”

Why does Prince Harry cite historical reasons for his distrust of the press?

Prince Harry’s distrust of the press is rooted in the death of his mother, Princess Diana, in 1997, where aggressive photographers were involved in a car crash. He also mentions alleged racist attitudes and intrusive media behavior.

How is Prince Harry challenging the decision regarding his security?

Prince Harry is challenging the decision of the Executive Committee for the Protection of Royalty and Public Figures to provide his security on a “case by case” basis after his move to the US. He believes he should have bespoke security arrangements tailored to his unique situation.

More about Prince Harry Security Challenge

You may also like

Leave a Comment


BNB – Big Big News is a news portal that offers the latest news from around the world. BNB – Big Big News focuses on providing readers with the most up-to-date information from the U.S. and abroad, covering a wide range of topics, including politics, sports, entertainment, business, health, and more.

Editors' Picks

Latest News

© 2023 BBN – Big Big News