Gaza StripGeneral NewsHamasInternational agreementsIsraelIsrael-Hamas warPalestinian territories governmentWorld News Palestinians Call for Cease-fire at UN Session While Israel Advocates for Eradication of Hamas by Gabriel Martinez October 27, 2023 written by Gabriel Martinez October 27, 2023 9 comments Bookmark 34 At a tense United Nations meeting focusing on the Gaza conflict, the Palestinian ambassador urged an immediate halt to hostilities, proclaiming, “Stop the bombings and save lives.” Contrarily, Israel’s representative reiterated a firm stance, stating, “We will not relent until Hamas is eradicated.” The discussion unfolded in the expansive chamber of the General Assembly, comprising 193 member nations. A resolution seeking an immediate cease-fire in Gaza is slated for a vote on Friday, especially after the Security Council’s repeated failure to reach a consensus. Despite widespread support for the Arab-sponsored resolution to halt combat, Israel’s UN Ambassador Gilad Erdan argued that a cease-fire would merely allow Hamas to rearm and launch future attacks. Quoting numerous statements from Hamas pledging the destruction of Israel, Erdan declared that advocating for a cease-fire wasn’t a pursuit of peace, but rather an endeavor to restrict Israel from neutralizing a significant threat to its population. While Hamas’ actions resulted in the deaths of approximately 1,400 Israelis, Israel’s counter-strikes have led to over 7,000 Palestinian casualties, as per the Gaza Health Ministry. Emotional calls for safeguarding Palestinian civilians and humanitarian aid were echoed by multiple nations. In an allied development, Iran’s Foreign Minister indicated that Hamas was willing to release Israeli civilian hostages. He also urged the international community to facilitate the release of 6,000 Palestinian prisoners in Israel. Iran, a notable supporter of Hamas, indicated readiness to cooperate with Qatar and Turkey on humanitarian issues. Ambassador Erdan asserted that Israel’s actions were not an Arab-Israeli conflict or a Palestinian issue, but a battle against what he termed as “the genocidal Jihadist Hamas terror organization.” Riyad Mansour, the Palestinian UN Ambassador, countered by noting that the majority of casualties in Gaza were women and children. He questioned the moral basis of such a war, labeling it as criminal and barbaric. Jordan’s Foreign Minister, Ayman Safadi, representing the Arab Group, emotionally detailed the casualties among Palestinian children and criticized Israel for not adhering to international laws regarding the protection of civilians and infrastructure. Condemnation was not limited to Israel alone; Safadi also criticized the United States and its allies for fueling the conflict by supporting Israel’s military operations. Similarly, Iran’s representative accused the U.S. of being complicit in what he termed as a “genocide” against the Palestinians. The General Assembly meeting will reconvene on Friday, with the Palestinian-backed resolution up for a vote. While General Assembly resolutions are not legally binding, they serve as an indicator of global opinion. Erdan described the resolution as “a disgrace” for its omission of Hamas and urged member nations to reject it. Table of Contents Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about UN Meeting on Gaza ConflictWhat was the main topic discussed at the United Nations General Assembly meeting?Who opposed the call for a cease-fire at the UN meeting?What was Iran’s position regarding the conflict?What humanitarian concerns were raised by other countries at the UN meeting?What is the significance of the upcoming resolution vote?What did Jordan’s Foreign Minister say about the conflict?Was the United States mentioned in the discussions?What was the Palestinian UN Ambassador Riyad Mansour’s stance?What are the expected outcomes of the General Assembly meeting?How did Israel justify its actions in the conflict?More about UN Meeting on Gaza Conflict Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about UN Meeting on Gaza Conflict What was the main topic discussed at the United Nations General Assembly meeting? The main topic discussed at the meeting was the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas in Gaza. The assembly focused on a resolution calling for an immediate cease-fire, the protection of civilians, and the delivery of humanitarian aid to Gaza. Who opposed the call for a cease-fire at the UN meeting? Israel’s UN Ambassador Gilad Erdan opposed the call for a cease-fire, stating that it would only allow Hamas time to rearm for future attacks against Israel. What was Iran’s position regarding the conflict? Iran’s Foreign Minister indicated that Hamas was willing to release Israeli civilian hostages and called on the international community to facilitate the release of 6,000 Palestinian prisoners held in Israel. Iran is also a notable backer of Hamas and expressed readiness to cooperate with Qatar and Turkey on humanitarian issues. What humanitarian concerns were raised by other countries at the UN meeting? Numerous countries expressed concerns about the high number of Palestinian civilian casualties, particularly women and children. There were also calls for the urgent delivery of food, water, medicine, and fuel to Gaza. What is the significance of the upcoming resolution vote? While resolutions of the UN General Assembly are not legally binding, they serve as an indicator of global opinion on the issue. The resolution up for vote calls for an immediate cease-fire, the protection of civilians, and the provision of essential goods in Gaza. What did Jordan’s Foreign Minister say about the conflict? Representing the Arab Group, Jordan’s Foreign Minister Ayman Safadi emotionally detailed the casualties among Palestinian children and criticized Israel for not adhering to international laws regarding the protection of civilians and infrastructure. Was the United States mentioned in the discussions? Yes, the U.S. was criticized for its role in supporting Israel’s military operations. Iran’s representative specifically accused the U.S. of being complicit in what he termed as a “genocide” against the Palestinians. What was the Palestinian UN Ambassador Riyad Mansour’s stance? Riyad Mansour argued that the majority of casualties in Gaza were women and children and questioned the moral basis of the war. He labeled it as criminal and barbaric, urging immediate action to save lives. What are the expected outcomes of the General Assembly meeting? The meeting is expected to reconvene to vote on a resolution calling for an immediate cease-fire and humanitarian aid to Gaza. The outcome will serve as an indicator of global opinion on the issue. How did Israel justify its actions in the conflict? Israel’s UN Ambassador Gilad Erdan stated that Israel is not at war with the Palestinians but is fighting against the “genocidal Jihadist Hamas terror organization.” He argued that a cease-fire would merely allow Hamas to rearm. More about UN Meeting on Gaza Conflict United Nations General Assembly Gaza Conflict Overview Humanitarian Concerns in Gaza UN Security Council Resolutions on Israel-Palestine Iran’s Role in the Israel-Hamas Conflict U.S. Involvement in Middle East Politics International Laws on Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict Israel’s Official Statements on Gaza Conflict Palestinian Representatives at the UN Arab Group’s Position on Israel-Gaza Conflict You Might Be Interested In Biden Rallies Democratic Backing, McCarthy Courts GOP Ahead of House Debt Ceiling Vote Orkney Islands Explores Greater Autonomy Following Brexit, Raises Independence Possibility Why Turkey’s currency is crashing after Erdogan got reelected Mayor of Coastal Oregon City Resigns Following Controversial Facebook Group Posts by Police “The Synchronization of Sound: How Formula One and Music Converge in a Sonic Harmony” Representative Ken Buck to Challenge Party Direction Post-Trump Era in his Departure from the House Cease-firediplomacyGaza conflictGaza StripGeneral NewsHamashumanitarian crisisInternational agreementsinternational lawIsraelIsrael-Hamas warIsrael-PalestineMiddle East PoliticsPalestinian territories governmentResolutionUnited Nations Share 0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail Gabriel Martinez Follow Author Gabriel Martinez is a science and technology journalist who covers the latest news and developments in the world of science. He is passionate about exploring new frontiers in technology, from artificial intelligence to space exploration. previous post Top Basketball Recruit Flagg Postpones College Decision in Wake of Maine Mass Shooting next post Understanding the Gaza Health Ministry and its Methodology for Calculating War Casualties You may also like Bookmark A woman who burned Wyoming’s only full-service abortion... December 28, 2023 Bookmark Argument over Christmas gifts turns deadly as 14-year-old... December 28, 2023 Bookmark Danny Masterson sent to state prison to serve... December 28, 2023 Bookmark Hong Kong man jailed for 6 years after... December 28, 2023 Bookmark AP concludes at least hundreds died in floods... December 28, 2023 Bookmark Live updates | Israeli forces raid a West... December 28, 2023 9 comments Robert Miller October 27, 2023 - 4:03 am Iran’s involvement is interesting. They’re backing Hamas, but also talking about humanitarian endeavors? Kinda contradicts itself, doesn’t it? Reply Nancy Williams October 27, 2023 - 8:47 am It’s so disheartening to hear both sides so entrenched in their views. Can’t we all just get along? Reply Laura Green October 27, 2023 - 10:35 am Jordan’s Foreign Minister said it best: “The right to self-defense is not a license to kill with impunity.” That sentence should be remembered by all sides. Reply Tom Johnson October 27, 2023 - 11:51 am what Erdan said about not resting until Hamas is obliterated feels way too harsh. War’s never a solution and when it’s over, what then? Reply Henry Lee October 27, 2023 - 1:09 pm Just reading about the UN meeting gives me a headache. Too much politics, not enough action. People are dying while they debate. Reply Mike O'Neal October 27, 2023 - 2:07 pm the role of the US needs to be looked at more closely. Are we actually helping, or just fueling the fire? Reply Sara Lewis October 27, 2023 - 6:00 pm I can’t believe the UN can’t agree on a ceasefire. What’s the point of these international bodies if they cant even make that happen? Reply Emily Davis October 27, 2023 - 8:50 pm The numbers of casualties are staggering, especially among women and children. It’s heartbreaking. Doesn’t international law have anything to say bout this? Reply Jane Smith October 27, 2023 - 9:50 pm This situation is really complex, and I’m worried we’re not getting the whole story. Both sides have their arguments, but innocent lives are at stake here. Reply Leave a Comment Cancel Reply Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Δ