LOGIN

NCAA President Charlie Baker calls for new tier of Division I where schools can pay athletes

by Madison Thomas
6 comments
NCAA Division I Reforms

NCAA President Charlie Baker has unveiled a proposal calling for the establishment of a new tier within Division I athletics. This tier is intended to address the disparities in resources among various schools within the NCAA. Baker’s plan envisions schools with substantial resources being able to provide unlimited educational benefits to student-athletes, engage in name, image, and likeness (NIL) partnerships with athletes, and directly compensate them through a trust fund.

In a letter distributed to more than 350 Division I institutions, Baker emphasized the challenges arising from the differing levels of resources, particularly between the wealthiest schools in the Football Bowl Subdivision (FBS) and the rest of Division I, including Division II and Division III institutions. He pointed out that these challenges encompass not only competitiveness but also financial considerations, exacerbated by the emergence of NIL opportunities for student-athletes and the advent of the Transfer Portal.

The current Division I structure consists of the FBS and the FCS (Football Championship Subdivision). Baker’s proposal is specifically aimed at creating a new subdivision tailored for schools affiliated with the Power Five conferences, which include the Big Ten, Southeastern Conference, Big 12, Atlantic Coast Conference, and Pac-12. It’s worth noting that conference realignment, set to commence in 2024, will lead to the Pac-12’s exit from this group.

To highlight the financial disparities within Division I, Baker provided figures showing that athletic budgets range from $5 million to $250 million annually, with 59 schools exceeding $100 million and another 32 surpassing $50 million. However, 259 Division I schools allocate less than $50 million to their athletic programs. This divergence in financial resources has complicated efforts to modernize the collegiate sports model.

Moreover, Baker emphasized the complex external landscape, as courts and public entities continue to deliberate on reform measures that could potentially impact college athletics. The NCAA has been urging Congress to enact federal legislation regulating how athletes are compensated for NIL deals. Baker, who assumed the role of NCAA President in March, is leading this effort.

Additionally, the NCAA faces legal challenges that may require revenue-sharing and could lead to athletes being categorized as employees. One ongoing antitrust case has the potential to result in substantial damages for the NCAA.

In light of these challenges, Baker called upon NCAA member institutions to establish a framework for “fundamental changes.” His proposal includes two key components: allowing all Division I colleges and universities to offer enhanced educational benefits to student-athletes and enabling Division I schools to engage in NIL licensing agreements with their athletes. These changes aim to expand financial opportunities for all Division I student-athletes.

Baker also stressed the importance of achieving gender equity in athletics by obliging schools in the new Division I tier to adhere to gender equity regulations while investing a minimum of $30,000 annually into an enhanced educational trust fund for at least half of their eligible student-athletes. Moreover, the proposed DI subdivision would grant members the flexibility to establish unique rules pertaining to scholarship commitments, roster size, recruitment, transfers, and NIL arrangements.

This proposal represents a significant step in addressing the financial and competitive imbalances within Division I athletics and adapting to the evolving landscape of collegiate sports.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about NCAA Division I Reforms

What is the main goal of NCAA President Charlie Baker’s proposal?

Charlie Baker’s proposal aims to establish a new tier within Division I athletics to address the disparities in resources among different schools in the NCAA. This tier would allow schools with greater resources to offer unlimited educational benefits, engage in name, image, and likeness (NIL) partnerships with athletes, and directly compensate them through a trust fund.

Why does Charlie Baker believe this proposal is necessary?

Baker argues that the existing disparities in financial resources among NCAA member schools, particularly between the wealthiest schools in the Football Bowl Subdivision (FBS) and others, are creating challenges in collegiate sports. These challenges include issues related to competitiveness, finances, and the impact of NIL opportunities for student-athletes and the Transfer Portal.

Which schools would be the primary beneficiaries of this new tier in Division I?

The proposal is primarily focused on schools affiliated with the Power Five conferences: the Big Ten, Southeastern Conference, Big 12, Atlantic Coast Conference, and Pac-12. However, conference realignment may impact the composition of this group.

How does the financial landscape of Division I athletics vary according to Baker’s proposal?

Baker’s proposal highlights the significant disparity in athletic budgets among Division I schools. These budgets range from $5 million to $250 million annually. Notably, 59 schools spend over $100 million annually on athletics, while another 32 schools spend over $50 million. In contrast, 259 Division I schools allocate less than $50 million to their athletic programs.

What external factors complicate efforts to modernize collegiate sports, as mentioned in the proposal?

According to Baker, the external factors complicating modernization efforts include ongoing legal debates and reform measures that could impact college athletics. These debates involve discussions about how athletes can be compensated for NIL deals and potential legal challenges, such as antitrust cases that may require revenue-sharing and affect athletes’ employment status.

How does Baker’s proposal address gender equity in college athletics?

Baker’s proposal includes provisions to promote gender equity in collegiate sports. It suggests that schools in the new tier of Division I should adhere to gender equity regulations while investing at least $30,000 per year into an enhanced educational trust fund for at least half of their eligible student-athletes.

What flexibility does the proposed Division I tier provide for member institutions?

The proposal grants member institutions in the new Division I tier the flexibility to create unique rules related to scholarship commitments, roster size, recruitment practices, athlete transfers, and NIL arrangements. This flexibility is intended to allow schools to adapt to the changing landscape of college athletics while remaining compliant with overarching regulations.

More about NCAA Division I Reforms

You may also like

6 comments

TransferTalk December 5, 2023 - 6:05 pm

Transfer Portal getting a mention! That’s a whole other story, isn’t it?

Reply
NIL_Champ December 5, 2023 - 10:09 pm

NIL deals for all! It’s a game-changer, no doubt.

Reply
PoliticalPundit December 6, 2023 - 1:19 am

About time! Politics, sports, and money – always an interesting mix!

Reply
TeamEquality December 6, 2023 - 1:36 am

Good to see they’re addressing gender equity. Let’s level that field!

Reply
SportsFan33 December 6, 2023 - 1:54 am

wow this sounds big! college sports gettin’ a shake-up, huh? big money gaps between schools, makin’ it hard to keep up.

Reply
EconGeek27 December 6, 2023 - 3:16 pm

Finally, some action on the $$$ front in college sports. Equity matters!

Reply

Leave a Comment

logo-site-white

BNB – Big Big News is a news portal that offers the latest news from around the world. BNB – Big Big News focuses on providing readers with the most up-to-date information from the U.S. and abroad, covering a wide range of topics, including politics, sports, entertainment, business, health, and more.

Editors' Picks

Latest News

© 2023 BBN – Big Big News

en_USEnglish