Modi of India Confronts No-Confidence Motion Over Lack of Response to Ethnic Strife in Manipur

Sure, here’s a paraphrased version of the provided text:

Prime Minister Narendra Modi of India appears to be focused on his international reputation, launching high-speed rail projects, and mingling with world leaders, while representing an emerging India. His social media channels project this image, followed by millions.

This portrayal contrasts sharply with his noticeable silence regarding the escalating ethnic conflict in India’s northeastern state of Manipur, which has reached near-civil war proportions.

Despite being in power for three months during the most significant ethnic violence in Manipur’s history, where his Bharatiya Janata Party governs, Modi has remained uninvolved. This absence of action has ignited a no-confidence movement against him in Parliament, where his government holds the majority.

Although he’s expected to overcome the no-confidence motion this week, those supporting it hope that forcing the issue will compel Modi to address the Manipur crisis in Parliament.

The ethnic violence in Manipur, which began in early May, has left more than 150 dead and over 50,000 displaced. The violence was sparked by a dispute involving affirmative action, leading to protests and demands among various ethnic groups.

Modi’s silence has left many puzzled, including independent journalist Arati R. Jerath, who noted that the Prime Minister frequently showcases India’s accomplishments but avoids controversies.

The Prime Minister’s stance has been called into question with instances of communal violence, such as an attack inside a train and clashes during religious processions.

Jerath believes that Modi’s silence may protect his political image ahead of an upcoming general election, even as the conflict grows more significant and damaging to his reputation.

WHY IT MATTERS

The threat of ongoing violence in Manipur has caused division between communities, resulting in movement restrictions, arson, and violence, leading to the looting of nearly 3,000 weapons by mobs.

India’s Supreme Court has noted the collapse of law and order, and there are increasing concerns that the unrest may spread throughout the northeast region of the country, sharing ethnic ties with neighboring states.

The deployment of army personnel, including forces from the disputed India-China border, has also raised concerns about India’s defense posture against China if the issue lingers.

THE NO-CONFIDENCE MOTION

Though the opposition realizes they are unlikely to win the no-confidence vote, they believe it necessitates Modi addressing the Manipur crisis in Parliament.

An alliance of 26 opposition parties, the INDIA alliance, has been demanding a statement from Modi on Manipur and calling for actions such as the dismissal of Manipur’s chief official, a member of Modi’s party.

Despite the consistent protests inside and outside Parliament, efforts to pressure the government have so far proven unsuccessful. Gaurav Gogoi, a lawmaker who initiated the no-confidence motion, emphasized the need for the Prime Minister to articulate his vision through Parliament, criticizing the government’s “unwarranted indifference.”

Home Minister Amit Shah has visited Manipur, but overall, the government has been criticized for not sharing public information on the situation or plans to resolve the crisis.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about fokus keyword Modi

More about fokus keyword Modi

• Modi’s silence on Manipur’s ethnic violence
• The no-confidence motion against India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi
• Ethnic clashes and the political situation in Manipur
• India’s handling of ethnic violence and its implications on the northeastern region
• The political landscape in India, focusing on opposition parties and government responses to crises.