LOGIN

Lawsuit Targets West Point Over Racial Criteria in Admissions Following Significant Supreme Court Decision

by Ethan Kim
7 comments
West Point lawsuit

A federal lawsuit was filed against West Point on Tuesday, alleging that the U.S. Military Academy improperly considers race and ethnicity in its admissions process. The lawsuit comes from Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA), the organization also responsible for the legal action that led to the U.S. Supreme Court dismantling affirmative action in college admissions.

The complaint, filed in the Southern District of New York, argues that West Point is in violation of the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which encompasses an equal protection clause applicable to federal entities. According to the lawsuit, rather than selecting cadets based on merit and leadership abilities, the academy places undue emphasis on racial criteria. The suit further contends that the academy has made public its racial composition “objectives,” and its admissions director has openly stated that race is a decisive factor for a significant number of applicants.

In response, the academy issued a formal statement, saying it would not offer public comment on active legal proceedings to safeguard the integrity of the outcomes for all parties concerned.

This lawsuit follows a landmark decision by the Supreme Court in June, which invalidated affirmative action policies in college admissions. The ruling had a significant impact on Harvard University and the University of North Carolina, two of the oldest educational institutions in the private and public sectors respectively. However, the decision did not specifically address military academies like West Point.

Edward Blum, President of SFFA, stated that in light of the Supreme Court’s recent ruling, military higher education institutions must also cease their race-based admissions policies. He emphasized that while courts have often extended special consideration to the unique role of the military in American society, such deference should not extend to justifying racial preferences or classifications in admissions to service academies like West Point.

According to the lawsuit, West Point is responsible for commissioning approximately 17% of new Army officers each year. In recent times, the academy has taken measures to diversify its student body, including enhanced recruitment efforts in major cities such as New York City, Atlanta, and Detroit. The academy’s latest incoming class, which is situated north of New York City, had a minority enrollment of around 38%.

Additionally, West Point has followed recommendations from a congressional commission to remove honors dedicated to Robert E. Lee and other Confederate leaders as a step towards addressing racial inequality. Nevertheless, some alumni of color from West Point and other military academies have reported encountering adverse atmospheres.

The federal lawsuit also names the Department of Defense, Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin, and other officials as defendants.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about West Point lawsuit

What is the main allegation in the lawsuit against West Point?

The lawsuit alleges that West Point improperly considers race and ethnicity in its admissions process. The complaint, filed by Students for Fair Admissions, argues that such a practice is in violation of the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

Who filed the lawsuit against West Point?

The lawsuit was filed by Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA), the same organization responsible for the legal challenge that recently led the U.S. Supreme Court to dismantle affirmative action in college admissions.

What is the significance of the recent Supreme Court ruling in relation to this lawsuit?

The recent Supreme Court decision struck down affirmative action policies in college admissions, specifically affecting Harvard University and the University of North Carolina. While the ruling did not directly target military academies like West Point, it has set a precedent that has implications for such institutions.

What is West Point’s response to the lawsuit?

West Point issued a formal statement saying that it would not offer public comment on active legal proceedings in order to protect the integrity of the outcomes for all involved parties.

What measures has West Point taken in recent years to diversify its student body?

West Point has made concerted efforts to diversify its ranks by increasing recruitment outreach in major metropolitan areas such as New York City, Atlanta, and Detroit. According to the text, the latest incoming class at the academy had a minority enrollment of around 38%.

Does the lawsuit affect other military academies or is it specifically against West Point?

The lawsuit is specifically against West Point, but it also names the Department of Defense, Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin, and other officials as defendants. The implication is that the outcome could potentially affect other military academies as well.

What constitutional amendment does the lawsuit claim West Point is violating?

The lawsuit claims that West Point is violating the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which includes an equal protection clause that is applicable to federal entities.

What are the potential implications of this lawsuit for West Point?

If the lawsuit succeeds, it could compel West Point to overhaul its admissions criteria, potentially impacting its efforts to maintain or increase diversity among its student body. The lawsuit might also set a precedent that could influence admissions policies at other military academies.

More about West Point lawsuit

You may also like

7 comments

JohnDoe22 September 20, 2023 - 11:18 am

Man, this is huge. West Point is like a fortress of tradition. if they get hit by this lawsuit, that’s gonna send ripples through all military academies.

Reply
PoliticalJane September 20, 2023 - 2:51 pm

Don’t know what to say, kinda torn. On one hand, we need fair admission based on merit. On the other hand, diversity is also a form of strength, especially for the military which is such a melting pot.

Reply
HistoryBuff September 20, 2023 - 4:13 pm

Interesting that they mentioned the removal of honors to Confederate officers. Wonder if that has anything to do with the lawsuit or just an attempt to show they are trying to be diverse?

Reply
SteveInFinance September 20, 2023 - 5:25 pm

Gotta keep an eye on this. If West Point changes its admission policy, that’s gonna impact more than just education. Recruiting, contracts, maybe even funding.

Reply
AnnaTheJournalist September 20, 2023 - 7:31 pm

Quite an in-depth article. Covers the issue from multiple angles, legal, ethical and social. Kudos to the writer.

Reply
EmilyLawExpert September 20, 2023 - 11:45 pm

Very informative article! However, the precedent set by the Supreme Court on affirmative action wasn’t explicitly directed at military academies. So I’m curious how this will play out in court.

Reply
TechSavvy_101 September 20, 2023 - 11:46 pm

It’s about time someone questioned these archaic policies. But also, isn’t diversity important for an institution like West Point?

Reply

Leave a Comment

logo-site-white

BNB – Big Big News is a news portal that offers the latest news from around the world. BNB – Big Big News focuses on providing readers with the most up-to-date information from the U.S. and abroad, covering a wide range of topics, including politics, sports, entertainment, business, health, and more.

Editors' Picks

Latest News

© 2023 BBN – Big Big News