Lawsuit in Georgia Over Redistricting May Impact U.S. House Seat and State Legislature Control

47

If a judge determines that Republicans have unlawfully diluted the electoral influence of Black voters through redistricting, Democrats stand to gain not only a seat in the U.S. House of Representatives but also multiple seats in the Georgia State Legislature.

The legal proceedings commencing this Tuesday are part of a broader surge of court cases that have followed the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decision to uphold its understanding of the Voting Rights Act, dismissing a challenge brought by the state of Alabama.

The Voting Rights Act prohibits the drawing of electoral districts in a manner that discriminates against minority voters, ensuring that they have an equal opportunity to elect candidates of their choice.

Several states, including but not limited to Alabama, Georgia, Florida, Louisiana, South Carolina, and Texas, could see their 2024 congressional elections influenced by legal challenges to district boundaries established post-2020 Census. Collectively, these cases could alter the precarious grip that Republicans currently hold on the U.S. House.

U.S. District Judge Steve Jones is presiding over what is expected to be a two-week-long bench trial in Georgia. Should he rule against the state, it is anticipated that he would instruct the Republican-dominated General Assembly to revise the electoral districts in compliance with federal law.

Judge Jones is considering a consolidation of three distinct cases, which means his ruling could favor the challengers on some counts while rejecting others.

Earlier, in March 2022, Jones had found that portions of Georgia’s new electoral maps likely violated federal laws. However, he allowed these maps to be used in the 2022 elections, citing that last-minute alterations would create undue confusion.

According to Charles Bullock, a political scientist specializing in redistricting at the University of Georgia, Judge Jones is likely to favor the plaintiffs, based on his previous rulings.

The plaintiffs argue that given the addition of nearly half a million Black residents to Georgia’s population between 2010 and 2020—accounting for nearly half of the state’s total growth—there is room to establish another congressional seat with a Black majority on Atlanta’s west side. They also contend that the state could create three more Black-majority state Senate districts and five more Black-majority state House districts.

However, the defense argues that the plaintiffs have not sufficiently demonstrated that voter behavior is motivated by race rather than political allegiance. For instance, they cite the election of U.S. Rep. Lucy McBath, who is Black, in a district that initially had a small Black population.

The state’s defense also raises concerns that the plaintiffs’ approach would prioritize racial considerations to an extent that would contravene the law.

Kareem Crayton, Senior Director for Voting and Representation at New York University’s Brennan Center for Justice, questions Georgia’s stance that race was not a factor in redistricting, suggesting that this raises queries about potential discrimination in the drawing of electoral boundaries.

Republicans currently have a 9-5 majority in Georgia’s delegation to the U.S. House, up from an 8-6 majority in 2020 due to redistricting. Should the plaintiffs succeed, the delegation could revert to its earlier 8-6 balance. Furthermore, although the GOP holds substantial majorities in both chambers of the state legislature, a victory for the plaintiffs could result in more Black-majority districts that might elect Democrats, thereby narrowing the Republican advantage.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Georgia redistricting lawsuit

More about Georgia redistricting lawsuit

• Voting Rights Act of 1965
• U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Voting Rights Act Interpretation
• 2020 Census Data and Redistricting
• Georgia’s Current Congressional Delegation
• New York University’s Brennan Center for Justice
• Analysis by Charles Bullock on Redistricting
• Overview of Redistricting Cases Across the U.S.
• Federal Judges and Redistricting Rulings
• The Role of Partisanship in Redistricting