Judge sends FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried to jail, says crypto mogul tampered with witnesses

by Madison Thomas
Cryptocurrency mogul

FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried was taken into custody by authorities on Friday, leaving a federal courtroom with handcuffs after a judge decided to revoke his bail. This decision came after the judge concluded that Bankman-Fried, a once-respected figure in the cryptocurrency world, had repeatedly attempted to influence witnesses against him.

As Judge Lewis A. Kaplan explained his reasoning, Bankman-Fried listened with his head down. Judge Kaplan emphasized that Bankman-Fried’s actions had pushed the limits of his $250 million bail, raising concerns about the safety of the community and the integrity of the ongoing legal proceedings. The judge felt that the only way to ensure the protection of witnesses and the community was to have Bankman-Fried in custody.

Following the hearing’s conclusion, Bankman-Fried removed his suit jacket and tie, handing over personal items to his legal team. The sound of handcuffs was heard as they were placed on his wrists. U.S. marshals then escorted him out of the courtroom.

This marked a significant downfall for someone who was once hailed as a knowledgeable visionary in the crypto realm. Bankman-Fried had even testified before Congress and enlisted celebrities like Larry David, Tom Brady, and Stephen Curry to promote his ventures.

Judge Kaplan asserted that there was credible evidence indicating Bankman-Fried’s attempts to tamper with witnesses, citing instances where he shared private writings of a former girlfriend and key witness with a journalist. Additionally, the judge highlighted an encrypted communication sent to FTX’s general counsel in January as evidence of tampering.

Kaplan believed that Bankman-Fried’s efforts were aimed at influencing not only expected trial witnesses but potentially others whose identities might not yet be known. This behavior suggested an attempt to discourage cooperation with the government and hinder the legal proceedings.

Bankman-Fried’s legal team argued that his intentions were innocent and motivated by a desire to safeguard his reputation against negative media coverage. Attorney Mark Cohen requested the judge to suspend the order for immediate incarceration, but this plea was denied. The defense swiftly filed a notice of appeal in response.

Until this point, Bankman-Fried had been under house arrest at his parents’ residence in Palo Alto, California, after being extradited from the Bahamas in December. He faced charges of defrauding investors and redirecting substantial amounts of cryptocurrency from customers using his FTX exchange.

The judge acknowledged that Bankman-Fried’s bail conditions included stringent restrictions on his internet and phone usage, but highlighted that these limitations did not prevent him from contacting a senior FTX attorney in January. This communication raised concerns for the judge, suggesting potential engagement in federal felonies while on release.

Judge Kaplan dismissed the defense’s assertion that the communication was harmless and interpreted it as an attempt to align recollections between Bankman-Fried and the FTX general counsel.

Prosecutors had demanded Bankman-Fried’s incarceration earlier due to alleged rule violations, such as sharing private writings of Caroline Ellison, his former girlfriend and ex-CEO of Alameda Research, with The New York Times. Prosecutors believed this was an effort to tarnish her reputation and potentially influence future jurors.

Judge Kaplan echoed these concerns, stating that the shared excerpts were not the kind of information typically disclosed, except with the intention to harm or discredit the subject.

Ellison had already pleaded guilty to criminal charges and agreed to testify against Bankman-Fried as part of a deal for a potentially reduced sentence. Bankman-Fried’s defense contended that the article actually portrayed Ellison in a favorable light, suggesting his attempt to protect his reputation failed.

Throughout this legal process, Judge Kaplan imposed a gag order to prevent public comments from trial participants, including Bankman-Fried. The New York Times lawyer, David McCraw, raised concerns about First Amendment implications and the public interest in Ellison and her cryptocurrency trading firm, emphasizing the importance of providing accurate and timely information to the public.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Cryptocurrency mogul

Who is Sam Bankman-Fried?

Sam Bankman-Fried is the founder of FTX, a cryptocurrency exchange. He was once respected as a crypto visionary.

Why was Sam Bankman-Fried sent to jail?

Sam Bankman-Fried was sent to jail after a judge revoked his bail. The judge concluded he had tampered with witnesses and breached bail terms.

What were the allegations against Sam Bankman-Fried?

Bankman-Fried faced allegations of defrauding investors and diverting cryptocurrency worth millions. He was also accused of attempting to influence witnesses.

How did Sam Bankman-Fried attempt to influence witnesses?

He shared private writings of a key witness with a journalist and had encrypted communication with FTX’s general counsel, raising concerns of witness tampering.

What was the judge’s reasoning for revoking bail?

The judge believed Bankman-Fried’s actions stretched the limits of his bail conditions, jeopardizing community safety and witness protection.

What impact did this have on Bankman-Fried’s reputation?

Bankman-Fried’s image suffered a significant downfall. He had been viewed as a crypto visionary, testified before Congress, and associated with celebrities.

What was the significance of the shared writings?

Bankman-Fried shared private writings of Caroline Ellison, his ex-girlfriend and a key witness. This was seen as an attempt to tarnish her reputation.

What were the consequences for Caroline Ellison?

Caroline Ellison pleaded guilty to criminal charges and agreed to testify against Bankman-Fried in exchange for a potentially reduced sentence.

How did the legal process unfold?

Bankman-Fried had been under house arrest, facing accusations of defrauding investors and diverting cryptocurrency. He was extradited from the Bahamas.

What were the defense’s arguments?

Bankman-Fried’s defense claimed his intentions were innocent and aimed at protecting his reputation against negative media coverage.

Why did the judge impose a gag order?

The judge imposed a gag order to prevent public comments from trial participants to ensure a fair legal process.

What was the response to the gag order?

The New York Times lawyer highlighted First Amendment concerns and the public’s interest in accurate information about the case.

More about Cryptocurrency mogul

You may also like


BitCoinEnthusiast August 12, 2023 - 8:27 am

whoa, so he messed up big time, huh? tampering with witnesses n’ all. not a good look for someone who was s’posed to be a big shot in the crypto world. smh.

cryptoDude93 August 12, 2023 - 11:08 am

dang, Sam Bankman-Fried got himself locked up? that’s wild man. used to think he was like a genius or smth with all that crypto stuff. guess not.

TechGeek42 August 12, 2023 - 2:23 pm

sam bankman-fried, the guy behind FTX, he’s in cuffs now? like seriously? this is cray cray. used to be like a crypto hero or something, now he’s like a villain?


Leave a Comment


BNB – Big Big News is a news portal that offers the latest news from around the world. BNB – Big Big News focuses on providing readers with the most up-to-date information from the U.S. and abroad, covering a wide range of topics, including politics, sports, entertainment, business, health, and more.

Editors' Picks

Latest News

© 2023 BBN – Big Big News