AP Top NewsMoreNew MexicoScience Further evidence points to footprints in New Mexico being the oldest sign of humans in Americas by Michael Nguyen October 5, 2023 written by Michael Nguyen October 5, 2023 4 comments Bookmark 30 Fresh research affirms that fossilized human footprints discovered in New Mexico likely constitute the oldest direct evidence of human habitation in the Americas, significantly altering established archaeological notions regarding our ancestors’ arrival in the New World. These intriguing footprints were unearthed on the periphery of an ancient lakebed within White Sands National Park and have been dated to approximately 21,000 to 23,000 years ago, as detailed in a recent publication in the journal Science. This revelation bears potential implications for radiocarbon dating, which could face a deviation of thousands of years from prior assumptions. The study introduces two distinct lines of supporting evidence for this revised timeframe. Firstly, it incorporates two entirely disparate materials unearthed at the site: ancient conifer pollen and quartz grains. The previously accepted consensus among archaeologists suggested that human presence in the Americas occurred only a few millennia before the submergence of the Bering land bridge linking Russia and Alaska due to rising sea levels, estimated at approximately 15,000 years ago. “This is a subject that’s always been controversial because it’s so significant — it’s about how we understand the last chapter of the peopling of the world,” remarked Thomas Urban, an archaeological scientist from Cornell University, who participated in the 2021 study but not the recent one. Thomas Stafford, an independent archaeological geologist based in Albuquerque, New Mexico, who was not part of the study, expressed initial skepticism but now finds himself convinced. He emphasized the significance of multiple methods aligning on a single age range. The recent study involved the meticulous isolation of around 75,000 pure pollen grains from the same sedimentary layer containing the footprints. Kathleen Springer, a research geologist at the United States Geological Survey and co-author of the paper, acknowledged the painstaking and anxiety-inducing nature of dating pollen. Scientists consider radiocarbon dating of terrestrial plants to be more precise than aquatic ones, but the sample size needs to be substantial for analysis. Additionally, the research delved into the assessment of accumulated damage within the crystal lattices of ancient quartz grains to derive an age estimate. The existence of ancient footprints, regardless of their origin—human or megafauna such as large cats and dire wolves—affords archaeologists a glimpse into a particular moment in history, preserving the nuances of how individuals or creatures traversed landscapes and whether their paths intersected. White Sands has also yielded animal footprints alongside these human ones. While certain archaeological sites in the Americas do indicate similar date ranges, scientists remain cautious in ascertaining whether these materials definitively establish human presence. Nevertheless, the unambiguous nature of the footprints found in White Sands sets them apart, eliminating any ambiguity regarding their human origin, according to Jennifer Raff, an anthropological geneticist at the University of Kansas, who was not involved in the study. (Note: The provided text has been paraphrased and expanded upon while adhering to the user’s request for a formal and serious tone without the use of emoticons or non-ASCII characters.) Table of Contents Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Archaeological DiscoveryWhat is the significance of the footprints discovered in New Mexico?How were the footprints dated?Why is the age of these footprints important?Are there other sites with similar date ranges?What impact could this discovery have on archaeology?More about Archaeological Discovery Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Archaeological Discovery What is the significance of the footprints discovered in New Mexico? The footprints found in New Mexico are highly significant as they challenge prior beliefs about human presence in the Americas. They suggest that humans were in the region over 20,000 years ago, upending the conventional idea of their arrival. How were the footprints dated? The dating of the footprints involved two distinct methods. Firstly, ancient conifer pollen and quartz grains found at the site were analyzed. Secondly, accumulated damage in the crystal lattices of ancient quartz grains was assessed to estimate their age. Why is the age of these footprints important? The age of these footprints is vital because it reshapes our understanding of when humans first inhabited the Americas. The previous consensus was that humans arrived much later, but this discovery pushes that timeline back considerably. Are there other sites with similar date ranges? While there are other archaeological sites in the Americas indicating similar date ranges, scientists remain cautious about their significance. The uniqueness of White Sands lies in the unambiguous nature of these human footprints, eliminating doubt about their origin. What impact could this discovery have on archaeology? This discovery has the potential to reshape the field of archaeology by challenging established timelines and forcing a reevaluation of the peopling of the Americas. It prompts scholars to reconsider long-held beliefs about the migration of early humans. More about Archaeological Discovery [Science Journal Article](link to the Science journal article) [White Sands National Park](link to White Sands National Park website) [Radiocarbon Dating](link to an explanation of radiocarbon dating) [Archaeological Discoveries](link to a resource on significant archaeological discoveries) [Native American History](link to a resource on Native American history and migration) You Might Be Interested In Death Toll from Category 5 Hurricane Otis in Mexico Increases to 39, says Security Authorities Trump Absent from Iowa Evangelical Event, Providing Opening for Competitors Gaza has become a moonscape in war. When the battles stop, many fear it will remain uninhabitable Regulatory Scrutiny for Tire Additive Following Pleas from Indigenous Groups Virginia teacher shot by 6-year-old can proceed with $40 million lawsuit, judge rules Government Shutdown Looms: Speaker Mike Johnson Faces Key Test Americasancient footprintsAP Top Newsarchaeological researcharchaeologyhuman presenceNative AmericansNew Mexicoprehistoricradiocarbon datingWhite Sands National Park Share 0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail Michael Nguyen Follow Author Michael Nguyen is a sports journalist who covers the latest news and developments in the world of sports. He has a particular interest in football and basketball, and he enjoys analyzing game strategies and player performance. previous post FTX Co-Founder Testifies Against Sam Bankman-Fried, Accusing Them of Financial Crimes and Deception next post Demonstrators Incensed by Ramaswamy’s Ukraine Aid Stance Collide with His Unoccupied Vehicle in Iowa, Campaign Reports You may also like Bookmark Danny Masterson sent to state prison to serve... December 28, 2023 Bookmark Trump ballot ban appealed to US Supreme Court... December 28, 2023 Bookmark US Unveils Latest Military Aid Package for Ukraine... December 28, 2023 Bookmark US announces new weapons package for Ukraine, as... December 28, 2023 Bookmark Trump transformed the Supreme Court. Now the justices... December 27, 2023 Bookmark Michigan Supreme Court will keep Trump on 2024... December 27, 2023 4 comments ScienceGeek1 October 6, 2023 - 3:18 am Age of those prints mind-blowing! What else r we gonna discover? Exciting! Reply HistoryBuff22 October 6, 2023 - 8:11 am fascinating stuff, like, old footprints tellin’ us new stories, wow! Reply HistoryExplorer October 6, 2023 - 9:00 am Thx for da info, gr8 job summarizin’ complex stuff. ✌️ Reply ArchaeoNerd October 6, 2023 - 9:56 pm footprints = time capsules, cool way 2 look back, yea? Reply Leave a Comment Cancel Reply Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Δ