Federal Judge Temporarily Suspends Limited Gag Order on Trump Regarding 2020 Election Interference Case

29

The presiding federal judge in Washington, D.C. overseeing the 2020 election interference case against Donald Trump consented on Friday to a temporary suspension of the limited gag order she had earlier imposed. This decision affords Trump’s legal team an opportunity to argue why the former President should not be subject to speech restrictions as the case advances toward a trial.

During this interim period, the judge is evaluating Trump’s request to speak openly about the case while simultaneously appealing the limitations to higher judicial bodies.

Earlier this week, Judge Chutkan had enforced a gag order that prohibited Trump from publicly commenting on prosecutors, members of the court, and potential witnesses. This restriction is the most stringent constraint to date on Trump’s often inflammatory language, a focal point of his ongoing, grievance-fueled campaign for re-election.

Trump’s legal representatives immediately lodged an appeal with the D.C. Circuit Court, submitting legal documents on Friday stating that the gag order should be temporarily annulled as Trump’s legal challenges are under consideration. They contend that neither the judge nor the prosecution have adequately substantiated the need for such a gag order, further noting that Trump “has not unlawfully threatened or harassed anyone.”

“In curtailing President Trump’s freedom of expression, the gag order essentially strips away the rights of hundreds of millions of Americans, who are now prohibited from hearing President Trump’s perspectives on crucial matters,” argued the defense.

Judge Chutkan has directed Special Counsel Jack Smith’s team to present by Wednesday any counterarguments against Trump’s request for a more extended suspension of the gag order while the appeal is pending.

In her initial ruling on Monday, Judge Chutkan stipulated that Trump could levy general criticisms against the Department of Justice and maintain his assertions that he is innocent and that the legal case against him is driven by political motivations. However, she emphasized that his remarks denigrating prosecutors and potential witnesses have overstepped a boundary, potentially inciting his followers to intimidate or harass those involved.

At various rallies and through social media, Trump has endeavored to vilify Smith and others, depicting himself as a victim of a politically-biased judicial system designed to thwart his political aspirations.

Trump has condemned the gag order as a violation of constitutional rights and has used this as a platform to further assert that he is the subject of political persecution. He denies any illicit activities related to the charges that accuse him of illegal maneuvers to reverse his 2020 election loss to Democrat Joe Biden.

This marks the second gag order imposed on Trump in recent weeks. Earlier this month, another judge in New York instituted a less restrictive gag order in a separate civil fraud trial against Trump, following a social media post from the former president that disparaged the judge’s principal clerk.

On Friday, Trump was penalized with a $5,000 fine after a derogatory post remained on his campaign website weeks after it was ordered removed. Judge Arthur Engoron refrained from holding Trump in contempt of court for the moment but noted the possibility of future punitive actions, including potential incarceration, if Trump violates the limited gag order again.

In a separate filing on Friday, Trump’s lawyers responded to a prosecutor’s appeal for measures to safeguard the identities of prospective jurors. The prosecution expressed apprehension about how Trump might exploit information about potential jurors, citing his “continued utilization of social media as a means of intimidation in judicial proceedings.”

In their response, Trump’s legal team insisted that the former president has “no intention” of revealing the names or other details about jurors and took issue with any suggestion that jurors could be at risk due to their involvement in Trump’s trial. “Should such assertions be presented to the jury, they would be exceedingly prejudicial and would necessitate an immediate mistrial,” stated Trump’s attorneys.

---

Reported by Richer from Boston.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about gag order suspension

More about gag order suspension

• CNN – Judge temporarily lifts narrow gag order on Trump in 2020 election interference case
• The Washington Post – Judge temporarily suspends Trump’s gag order in election interference case
• D.C. Circuit Court
• NBC News – Trump fined $5,000 for violating gag order in civil fraud trial
• ABC News – Trump’s legal team responds to prosecutor’s concerns about juror safety