Brett FavreGeneral NewsLawsuitsMississippiShannon SharpeU.S. News Federal Judge Dismisses Defamation Case Against Shannon Sharpe by Brett Favre, Citing Protected Speech and Hyperbole by Lucas Garcia October 31, 2023 written by Lucas Garcia October 31, 2023 7 comments Bookmark 47 On Monday, U.S. District Judge Keith Starrett dismissed the defamation lawsuit initiated by retired NFL player Brett Favre against his fellow retiree and former NFL player, Shannon Sharpe. The court determined that Sharpe was engaged in constitutionally protected speech during a sports broadcast in which he critiqued Favre’s involvement in a welfare misallocation case in Mississippi. Sharpe, a former tight end in the NFL, had made statements on the Fox Sports talk show “Skip and Shannon: Undisputed,” suggesting that Favre was “siphoning from the disadvantaged,” and had “diverted money from individuals in dire need.” Judge Starrett ruled that such statements constituted “rhetorical hyperbole” and were therefore protected speech. Favre had initiated legal action against Sharpe in February, alleging that Sharpe had made “grossly untrue” claims about him. The litigation was moved to federal jurisdiction in March, while Sharpe exited the aforementioned sports show in June. The lawsuit came after significant media reporting regarding allegations tied to what is being described as Mississippi’s largest public corruption case. Mississippi Auditor Shad White indicated that between 2016 and 2019, the Mississippi Department of Human Services had misappropriated over $77 million from the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program, a fund designed to assist some of America’s most impoverished citizens. Prosecutors allege that the department allocated these funds to nonprofit entities, which in turn used the money on projects that were favored by affluent and influential individuals. Among such projects was a $5 million volleyball facility at the University of Southern Mississippi, a project for which Favre had committed to fundraising. In his ruling, Judge Starrett clarified that Sharpe’s usage of terms like “taking” and “stole” were in reference to the misdirection of TANF resources away from their intended purpose of aiding the underprivileged. He also stated that no rational person would infer from Sharpe’s broadcast that Favre had physically stolen money from impoverished Mississippi residents. Following the dismissal, Sharpe publicly acknowledged the court’s decision and expressed gratitude toward his legal representation via a post on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter. Late on Monday, The Big Big News reached out to Michael Shemper, the legal counsel for Favre, to comment on the dismissal, but there was no immediate response. While Favre is not subject to criminal proceedings, he is one of multiple individuals and corporations the state is suing in an effort to recoup improperly spent welfare funds. Favre has also initiated defamation lawsuits against Auditor Shad White and former NFL punter and sportscaster Pat McAfee earlier this year. The case against McAfee was terminated in May after an apology from McAfee, but the lawsuit against White is ongoing. Favre has reimbursed $1.1 million that he had previously received as speaking fees from a nonprofit organization, which had been allocated TANF funds by the Mississippi Department of Human Services. Auditor White indicated that Favre did not appear to fulfill his speaking commitments. In a separate development in December, the department asserted a new claim against Favre and a university sports foundation for up to $5 million, stating that welfare funds had been incorrectly used to finance a volleyball facility at the University of Southern Mississippi, Favre’s alma mater. Legal filings in the state’s civil case reveal text messages between Favre and associates discussing the channeling of funds toward the volleyball facility via a nonprofit organization under contract with the Department of Human Services. Table of Contents Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Defamation Lawsuit DismissalWhat was the defamation lawsuit that Brett Favre filed against Shannon Sharpe?Who is the judge presiding over the case?On what grounds did Judge Keith Starrett dismiss the defamation lawsuit?What was the welfare misallocation case in Mississippi?Was Brett Favre involved in the welfare misallocation case?Are there other defamation lawsuits filed by Brett Favre?What was Shannon Sharpe’s reaction after the lawsuit’s dismissal?More about Defamation Lawsuit Dismissal Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Defamation Lawsuit Dismissal What was the defamation lawsuit that Brett Favre filed against Shannon Sharpe? Brett Favre filed a defamation lawsuit against fellow retired NFL player Shannon Sharpe, accusing him of making “grossly untrue” statements during an appearance on the Fox Sports talk show “Skip and Shannon: Undisputed.” Sharpe had criticized Favre’s involvement in a welfare misallocation case in Mississippi. Who is the judge presiding over the case? U.S. District Judge Keith Starrett presided over the case and ultimately dismissed it. On what grounds did Judge Keith Starrett dismiss the defamation lawsuit? Judge Starrett ruled that Sharpe’s statements constituted “rhetorical hyperbole,” which is considered constitutionally protected speech. He further clarified that Sharpe’s comments did not suggest that Favre had physically stolen money from impoverished individuals, but rather discussed the diversion of welfare funds. What was the welfare misallocation case in Mississippi? Between 2016 and 2019, the Mississippi Department of Human Services reportedly misallocated more than $77 million from the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program. Prosecutors claim that these funds were channeled to nonprofit organizations that used them on projects favored by affluent and connected individuals. Was Brett Favre involved in the welfare misallocation case? Brett Favre is not facing criminal charges but is among multiple individuals and corporations the state of Mississippi is suing to recover improperly spent welfare funds. Favre has reimbursed $1.1 million in speaking fees from a nonprofit that had been allocated TANF funds. Are there other defamation lawsuits filed by Brett Favre? Yes, Favre also initiated defamation lawsuits against Mississippi Auditor Shad White and former NFL punter and sportscaster Pat McAfee earlier this year. The lawsuit against McAfee was terminated after an apology, but the lawsuit against White is still pending. What was Shannon Sharpe’s reaction after the lawsuit’s dismissal? Following the court’s decision to dismiss the lawsuit, Shannon Sharpe publicly acknowledged the ruling and thanked his legal team via a post on the social media platform X, formerly known as Twitter. More about Defamation Lawsuit Dismissal Full Text of Judge Keith Starrett’s Ruling Original Fox Sports Broadcast of “Skip and Shannon: Undisputed” Mississippi Department of Human Services Welfare Misallocation Shannon Sharpe’s Public Statement on X, Formerly Twitter Mississippi Auditor Shad White’s Findings on TANF Misallocation Brett Favre’s Reimbursement of Speaking Fees Ongoing Legal Cases Involving Mississippi Welfare Misallocation You Might Be Interested In Mass Chaos Unleashed in New York’s Union Square due to Online Influencer’s Giveaway Event, Leading to Disorder and Destruction Trump tells supporters, ‘Guard the vote.’ Here’s the phrase’s backstory and why it’s raising concern Body Camera Footage Reveals High-Profile Federal Prosecutor Producing Department of Justice Credentials During DUI Incident ‘Bring them home’: As the battle for Gaza rages, hostage families wait with trepidation Key Developments in the Ongoing Israel-Hamas Conflict Upcoming ‘Joint Employer’ Regulation Could Boost Unionization, Despite Opposition Brett Favreconstitutional rightsdefamation lawsuitFox SportsGeneral NewsLawsuitslegal rulingMississippiMississippi Welfare Scandalprotected speechShannon SharpeTemporary Assistance for Needy FamiliesU.S. District Judge Keith Starrett Share 0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail Lucas Garcia Following Author Lucas Garcia, a seasoned business reporter, brings you the latest updates and trends in finance and economics. With a keen eye for market analysis and a knack for spotting investment prospects, he keeps investors informed and ahead of the curve. previous post Decline in North American Sales for Bud Light Following Transgender Promotion Controversy next post Princess Leonor of Spain Celebrates 18th Birthday with Inaugural Ceremony Signifying Future Queenship You may also like Bookmark A woman who burned Wyoming’s only full-service abortion... December 28, 2023 Bookmark Argument over Christmas gifts turns deadly as 14-year-old... December 28, 2023 Bookmark Danny Masterson sent to state prison to serve... December 28, 2023 Bookmark Hong Kong man jailed for 6 years after... December 28, 2023 Bookmark AP concludes at least hundreds died in floods... December 28, 2023 Bookmark Live updates | Israeli forces raid a West... December 28, 2023 7 comments JohnDoe45 October 31, 2023 - 7:02 pm Wow, so Favre’s case got dismissed huh? Seems like free speech won the day. But also raises questions abt who’s really accountable in this welfare scandal. Reply ConcernedCitizen October 31, 2023 - 7:42 pm Favre isnt criminally charged but he’s still being sued by the state? seems like he’s not fully off the hook yet. Reply LegalEagle November 1, 2023 - 3:56 am Interesting to see constitutional rights playing such a big role here. Judges often have to balance between defamation and free speech. looks like Judge Starrett had a clear view. Reply MississippiMama November 1, 2023 - 4:51 am Our state’s got bigger problems than this, like that $77 million gone missing. Where’s that money really going? And why aren’t more ppl talking abt it? Reply CryptoQueen November 1, 2023 - 10:18 am this case highlights the importance of understanding how rhetoric works. U can’t just sue someone because you don’t like what they’re saying, esp if its protected speech. Reply TANFSupporter November 1, 2023 - 10:25 am Its sad that the money meant for needy families is tied up in this kinda mess. Hope they sort this out soon, ppl are suffering. Reply SportsFanatic99 November 1, 2023 - 11:52 am I can’t believe Sharpe left the show in June and this was still going on. That’s months man. Lawsuits take forever. Reply Leave a Comment Cancel Reply Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Δ