LOGIN

Federal Judge Dismisses Defamation Case Against Shannon Sharpe by Brett Favre, Citing Protected Speech and Hyperbole

by Lucas Garcia
7 comments
Defamation Lawsuit Dismissal

On Monday, U.S. District Judge Keith Starrett dismissed the defamation lawsuit initiated by retired NFL player Brett Favre against his fellow retiree and former NFL player, Shannon Sharpe. The court determined that Sharpe was engaged in constitutionally protected speech during a sports broadcast in which he critiqued Favre’s involvement in a welfare misallocation case in Mississippi.

Sharpe, a former tight end in the NFL, had made statements on the Fox Sports talk show “Skip and Shannon: Undisputed,” suggesting that Favre was “siphoning from the disadvantaged,” and had “diverted money from individuals in dire need.” Judge Starrett ruled that such statements constituted “rhetorical hyperbole” and were therefore protected speech.

Favre had initiated legal action against Sharpe in February, alleging that Sharpe had made “grossly untrue” claims about him. The litigation was moved to federal jurisdiction in March, while Sharpe exited the aforementioned sports show in June. The lawsuit came after significant media reporting regarding allegations tied to what is being described as Mississippi’s largest public corruption case.

Mississippi Auditor Shad White indicated that between 2016 and 2019, the Mississippi Department of Human Services had misappropriated over $77 million from the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program, a fund designed to assist some of America’s most impoverished citizens.

Prosecutors allege that the department allocated these funds to nonprofit entities, which in turn used the money on projects that were favored by affluent and influential individuals. Among such projects was a $5 million volleyball facility at the University of Southern Mississippi, a project for which Favre had committed to fundraising.

In his ruling, Judge Starrett clarified that Sharpe’s usage of terms like “taking” and “stole” were in reference to the misdirection of TANF resources away from their intended purpose of aiding the underprivileged. He also stated that no rational person would infer from Sharpe’s broadcast that Favre had physically stolen money from impoverished Mississippi residents.

Following the dismissal, Sharpe publicly acknowledged the court’s decision and expressed gratitude toward his legal representation via a post on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter.

Late on Monday, The Big Big News reached out to Michael Shemper, the legal counsel for Favre, to comment on the dismissal, but there was no immediate response.

While Favre is not subject to criminal proceedings, he is one of multiple individuals and corporations the state is suing in an effort to recoup improperly spent welfare funds. Favre has also initiated defamation lawsuits against Auditor Shad White and former NFL punter and sportscaster Pat McAfee earlier this year. The case against McAfee was terminated in May after an apology from McAfee, but the lawsuit against White is ongoing.

Favre has reimbursed $1.1 million that he had previously received as speaking fees from a nonprofit organization, which had been allocated TANF funds by the Mississippi Department of Human Services. Auditor White indicated that Favre did not appear to fulfill his speaking commitments.

In a separate development in December, the department asserted a new claim against Favre and a university sports foundation for up to $5 million, stating that welfare funds had been incorrectly used to finance a volleyball facility at the University of Southern Mississippi, Favre’s alma mater. Legal filings in the state’s civil case reveal text messages between Favre and associates discussing the channeling of funds toward the volleyball facility via a nonprofit organization under contract with the Department of Human Services.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Defamation Lawsuit Dismissal

What was the defamation lawsuit that Brett Favre filed against Shannon Sharpe?

Brett Favre filed a defamation lawsuit against fellow retired NFL player Shannon Sharpe, accusing him of making “grossly untrue” statements during an appearance on the Fox Sports talk show “Skip and Shannon: Undisputed.” Sharpe had criticized Favre’s involvement in a welfare misallocation case in Mississippi.

Who is the judge presiding over the case?

U.S. District Judge Keith Starrett presided over the case and ultimately dismissed it.

On what grounds did Judge Keith Starrett dismiss the defamation lawsuit?

Judge Starrett ruled that Sharpe’s statements constituted “rhetorical hyperbole,” which is considered constitutionally protected speech. He further clarified that Sharpe’s comments did not suggest that Favre had physically stolen money from impoverished individuals, but rather discussed the diversion of welfare funds.

What was the welfare misallocation case in Mississippi?

Between 2016 and 2019, the Mississippi Department of Human Services reportedly misallocated more than $77 million from the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program. Prosecutors claim that these funds were channeled to nonprofit organizations that used them on projects favored by affluent and connected individuals.

Was Brett Favre involved in the welfare misallocation case?

Brett Favre is not facing criminal charges but is among multiple individuals and corporations the state of Mississippi is suing to recover improperly spent welfare funds. Favre has reimbursed $1.1 million in speaking fees from a nonprofit that had been allocated TANF funds.

Are there other defamation lawsuits filed by Brett Favre?

Yes, Favre also initiated defamation lawsuits against Mississippi Auditor Shad White and former NFL punter and sportscaster Pat McAfee earlier this year. The lawsuit against McAfee was terminated after an apology, but the lawsuit against White is still pending.

What was Shannon Sharpe’s reaction after the lawsuit’s dismissal?

Following the court’s decision to dismiss the lawsuit, Shannon Sharpe publicly acknowledged the ruling and thanked his legal team via a post on the social media platform X, formerly known as Twitter.

More about Defamation Lawsuit Dismissal

You may also like

7 comments

JohnDoe45 October 31, 2023 - 7:02 pm

Wow, so Favre’s case got dismissed huh? Seems like free speech won the day. But also raises questions abt who’s really accountable in this welfare scandal.

Reply
ConcernedCitizen October 31, 2023 - 7:42 pm

Favre isnt criminally charged but he’s still being sued by the state? seems like he’s not fully off the hook yet.

Reply
LegalEagle November 1, 2023 - 3:56 am

Interesting to see constitutional rights playing such a big role here. Judges often have to balance between defamation and free speech. looks like Judge Starrett had a clear view.

Reply
MississippiMama November 1, 2023 - 4:51 am

Our state’s got bigger problems than this, like that $77 million gone missing. Where’s that money really going? And why aren’t more ppl talking abt it?

Reply
CryptoQueen November 1, 2023 - 10:18 am

this case highlights the importance of understanding how rhetoric works. U can’t just sue someone because you don’t like what they’re saying, esp if its protected speech.

Reply
TANFSupporter November 1, 2023 - 10:25 am

Its sad that the money meant for needy families is tied up in this kinda mess. Hope they sort this out soon, ppl are suffering.

Reply
SportsFanatic99 November 1, 2023 - 11:52 am

I can’t believe Sharpe left the show in June and this was still going on. That’s months man. Lawsuits take forever.

Reply

Leave a Comment

BNB – Big Big News is a news portal that offers the latest news from around the world. BNB – Big Big News focuses on providing readers with the most up-to-date information from the U.S. and abroad, covering a wide range of topics, including politics, sports, entertainment, business, health, and more.

Editors' Picks

Latest News