Court Determines Donald Trump Engaged in Fraudulent Practices in Establishing Real Estate Ventures

by Madison Thomas
Trump Real Estate Fraud

On a recent Tuesday, a judicial decision asserted that Donald Trump engaged in fraudulent activities spanning multiple years as he constructed the real estate business that would eventually lead him to the presidency.

Presiding over a civil case initiated by New York Attorney General Letitia James, Judge Arthur Engoron concluded that the former U.S. President and his corporation misled financial institutions, insurance firms, and various other entities. They did so by significantly inflating the value of his assets and overstating his net worth in the documentation utilized for negotiations and acquiring loans.

As a punitive measure, Judge Engoron mandated the revocation of certain business licenses belonging to Trump, thereby hindering or entirely obstructing the Trump Organization’s capacity to conduct business in New York State. Additionally, the judge decreed the continued oversight of the Trump Organization by an independent auditor.

There was no immediate response from a representative of Trump regarding the judgment. Trump has consistently asserted that he has not committed any violations.

Additional Context

Days before the commencement of a bench trial in Attorney General James’ lawsuit, the ruling stands as the most substantial disavowal to date of Trump’s cultivated persona as a financially astute real estate tycoon who transitioned into a political luminary.

Beyond mere self-aggrandizing claims about his affluence, Trump and his organization were found to have systematically falsified information on their annual financial reports, thereby gaining advantages such as beneficial loan conditions and reduced insurance premiums, as per Engoron’s findings.

Engoron dismissed Trump’s argument that disclaimers on his financial documents could absolve him of any legal liability. The judge criticized the defendant’s logic in his comprehensive 35-page judgment, describing it as detached from reality.

Although Manhattan prosecutors considered pursuing a criminal case based on similar actions, they opted not to proceed, leaving Attorney General James to seek legal penalties that could disrupt Trump and his family’s business operations in New York.

The current ruling, issued during the summary judgment stage, resolves the principal accusation in James’ legal action, though six additional claims still remain pending. A bench trial is scheduled to begin on October 2nd, presided over by Judge Engoron, to further investigate these allegations and to determine additional penalties, if warranted. James is seeking penalties estimated at $250 million, along with a prohibition on Trump conducting business in New York, his home state.

Trump’s legal team had petitioned for dismissal of the case, which was declined by Engoron. They contended that James was not legally entitled to initiate the lawsuit due to a lack of evidence indicating public harm caused by Trump’s activities. Their additional argument, that many of the lawsuit’s allegations were time-barred by the statute of limitations, was also rejected by the judge.

The lawsuit brought by Attorney General James, a Democrat, was filed approximately a year ago and accuses Trump and his company of consistently overvaluing assets such as skyscrapers, golf courses, and his Mar-a-Lago estate, thereby inflating his financial portfolio by billions.

Among the specific charges were allegations that Trump exaggerated the size and value of his Trump Tower apartment in Manhattan and estimated the worth of Mar-a-Lago at an excessively high value that contravened deed restrictions.

Trump has steadfastly denied any misconduct, claiming that disclaimers on his financial statements invalidate the prosecution’s case. Engoron found this defense to be insufficient.

While the lawsuit does not risk incarceration for Trump, it does pose potential impediments to his future real estate transactions and could have long-lasting implications for his reputation as a developer.

Attorney General James has petitioned the court to prohibit Trump and his three eldest children from ever managing a New York-based company again and to restrict Trump and the Trump Organization from engaging in commercial real estate acquisitions for a period of five years, among other sanctions. The penalties she is seeking are estimated to be equal to the financial gains accrued from the alleged fraudulent activities.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Donald Trump fraud ruling

What was the ruling against Donald Trump about?

The ruling against Donald Trump, issued by Judge Arthur Engoron, declared that the former U.S. President and his organization engaged in fraudulent activities over several years. The case was initiated by New York Attorney General Letitia James, and it found that Trump and his company misled banks, insurers, and other entities by significantly inflating the value of his assets and overstating his net worth on financial documents.

Who issued the ruling and what were the punitive measures?

Judge Arthur Engoron issued the ruling as part of a civil lawsuit brought by New York’s Attorney General, Letitia James. As a punitive measure, Engoron ordered some of Trump’s business licenses to be revoked, making it difficult or impossible for him to conduct business in New York State. The judge also mandated that an independent monitor continue to oversee the Trump Organization’s operations.

Does the ruling have any immediate effects on Trump’s business operations?

Yes, the ruling has immediate implications. Judge Engoron ordered the revocation of some of Trump’s business licenses, effectively hindering or even entirely obstructing the Trump Organization’s capacity to conduct business in New York State.

What is the financial penalty that Attorney General Letitia James is seeking?

Attorney General Letitia James is seeking an estimated $250 million in penalties. This figure is based on the financial benefits that were allegedly accrued through the fraudulent activities.

Is this ruling related to any criminal charges against Donald Trump?

No, this is a civil case and does not carry the possibility of imprisonment for Donald Trump. Manhattan prosecutors had considered a criminal case for similar activities but ultimately declined to proceed. However, the ruling could have long-term implications on Trump’s ability to conduct business, especially in New York, his home state.

What are the remaining unresolved claims in this lawsuit?

The ruling resolves the principal accusation in Attorney General James’ legal action, but six additional claims still remain pending. A bench trial, presided over by Judge Engoron, is scheduled to begin on October 2nd to further investigate these allegations and to determine any additional penalties, if warranted.

Does the ruling have any implications for Trump’s political future?

While the ruling itself does not directly affect Donald Trump’s political standing, it could have implications on his reputation and, by extension, his political future. This is especially true if further legal penalties disrupt his business operations or tarnish his public image.

More about Donald Trump fraud ruling

  • Judge Arthur Engoron’s Ruling Summary
  • New York Attorney General Letitia James’ Lawsuit Against Donald Trump
  • Manhattan Prosecutors’ Decision Not to Pursue Criminal Case
  • Attorney General Letitia James’ Previous Legal Actions Against Donald Trump
  • Overview of Donald Trump’s Legal Challenges
  • Donald Trump’s Business Empire and Its Financial Practices

You may also like


WallStGuy September 26, 2023 - 11:31 pm

So Manhattan prosecutors decided not to go criminal. Interesting choice there. But AG James is not backing down, clearly. The civil route could still make waves.

PoliSciNerd September 27, 2023 - 4:02 am

Wonder how this is gonna play out for his 2024 plans. One thing’s for sure, this ruling definitely isn’t gonna make the campaign trail any easier.

CryptoQueen September 27, 2023 - 9:47 am

seriously? revoking business licenses? that’s really gonna hurt him. but $250 million in penalties? thats pocket change for him, isnt it?

RealEstateMogul September 27, 2023 - 10:52 am

I’ve been in real estate for years, and let me tell you, overvaluing assets ain’t uncommon. But Trump took it to another level, huh?

JohnDoe21 September 27, 2023 - 6:37 pm

Wow, this ruling is huge. Never thought I’d see the day when a former prez would get called out like this by a court. Makes ya wonder what’s gonna happen next.


Leave a Comment


BNB – Big Big News is a news portal that offers the latest news from around the world. BNB – Big Big News focuses on providing readers with the most up-to-date information from the U.S. and abroad, covering a wide range of topics, including politics, sports, entertainment, business, health, and more.

Editors' Picks

Latest News

© 2023 BBN – Big Big News