California Supreme Court Rules Police Can Be Held Liable for Misconduct During Investigations

117

In a significant decision, the California Supreme Court has ruled that police officers in the state can be held accountable through civil lawsuits for misconduct that occurs during the course of investigations. This ruling overturns a longstanding precedent set by lower courts that had shielded law enforcement from litigation related to their actions for decades.

The unanimous decision, announced on Thursday, rejects the argument put forth by Riverside County that its sheriff’s deputies are immune from lawsuits when they left a deceased man’s unclothed body exposed for eight hours while investigating his murder.

Previously, California law granted immunity to police officers from being sued for any harm caused during the prosecution process, even if their actions were found to be malicious and lacking probable cause. However, the Supreme Court’s recent ruling clarifies that officers can now be held liable for misconduct occurring during investigations.

The court’s decision is based on earlier case law, which distinguishes between investigative actions and the filing of formal charges. Justice Leondra Kruger, in the ruling, stated that the potential overlap between investigations and prosecutions does not justify treating them as one and the same.

Kruger highlighted a similar ruling issued by the court in 1974 but noted that a broader interpretation adopted by a state appeals court in 1994 had allowed police to evade misconduct lawsuits related to investigative conduct. Lower courts had been relying on this interpretation to dismiss cases involving law enforcement misconduct that occurred outside the context of prosecutions.

As of now, no comment has been received from the lawyer representing Riverside County in this particular case.

The case in question involved Jose Leon, who was fatally shot by a neighbor in 2017 in Riverside County, southeast of Los Angeles. According to the lawsuit, shortly after the sheriff’s deputies arrived at the scene, they heard gunshots nearby. They then proceeded to drag Leon’s body behind a police vehicle, causing his pants to fall and exposing his genitals. Leon’s wife, Dora Leon, filed a lawsuit against the county, alleging negligence and emotional distress, as the police had left her husband’s naked body visible for hours. Lower courts had dismissed the case, citing immunity granted by state law to law enforcement officers and agencies for conduct occurring during investigations.

However, the Supreme Court’s ruling reinstates Dora Leon’s lawsuit. Kruger stated that the lower courts had erred in considering police investigations as part of the prosecution process.

Richard Antognini, the attorney representing Leon, stated that many local police departments have frequently claimed immunity from damage claims as soon as an officer arrives at a crime scene. He emphasized that if the Supreme Court had ruled in favor of the county, it would have essentially granted them immunity for almost any misconduct.

Antognini also remarked that this recent ruling removes a major obstacle for victims seeking compensation for police misconduct. It should be noted that California laws still provide immunity for certain aspects of police investigations.

John Burris, a California civil rights attorney who has represented over 1,000 victims of police misconduct nationwide, applauded the ruling. He believes that it will have a positive impact on police reform, as it clarifies the obligations and responsibilities of law enforcement officers, promoting better training and awareness.

---

This report includes contributions from Claudia Lauer, a writer for Big Big News based in Philadelphia.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about police misconduct lawsuits

More about police misconduct lawsuits

• California Supreme Court rules police can be sued for misconduct during investigations
• California Supreme Court overturns precedent shielding police from misconduct lawsuits
• California Supreme Court allows lawsuits against police for misconduct during investigations
• California Supreme Court Decision – Full Text