3M CoBusinessClimate and environmentHealthMinnesotaMoreSt. PaulU.S. News 3M reaches $10.3 billion settlement over contamination of water systems with ‘forever chemicals’ by Ryan Lee June 23, 2023 written by Ryan Lee June 23, 2023 0 comments Bookmark 52 3M Co., a chemical manufacturer, has announced a settlement of at least $10.3 billion to resolve lawsuits regarding the contamination of numerous public drinking water systems in the United States. The contamination resulted from the presence of potentially harmful compounds known as per- and polyfluorinated substances (PFAS), commonly referred to as “forever chemicals.” PFAS are a class of chemicals used in various products such as firefighting foam, nonstick items, and grease-resistant materials. PFAS are called “forever chemicals” due to their resistance to natural degradation in the environment. These substances have been associated with various health issues, including damage to the liver, immune system, and certain types of cancer. Drinking water across the country has been found to contain varying levels of PFAS. In March, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposed stringent limits on two common types of PFAS, PFOA and PFOS, and expressed its intention to regulate four other types. Water providers will be responsible for monitoring their systems for the presence of these chemicals. The settlement resolves a case that was set to go to trial earlier this month, involving a lawsuit by Stuart, Florida, one of approximately 300 communities that filed similar suits against companies involved in the production of firefighting foam or PFAS-containing products. 3M Chairman Mike Roman referred to the settlement as a significant step forward, building upon the company’s decision in 2020 to phase out PFOA and PFOS and invest in advanced water filtration technology for its chemical manufacturing operations. The company, based in St. Paul, Minnesota, will cease all PFAS production by the end of 2025. The settlement payment will be distributed over a period of 13 years and could amount to as much as $12.5 billion, depending on the number of public water systems detecting PFAS during the testing required by the EPA over the next three years. The funds will be used to cover the costs associated with filtering PFAS from contaminated systems and conducting testing. Attorney Scott Summy, based in Dallas and representing plaintiffs suing 3M and other manufacturers, stated that the settlement would lead to healthier lives for millions of Americans by eliminating PFAS from their drinking water. In a separate agreement, three other companies, DuPont de Nemours Inc., Chemours Co., and Corteva Inc., reached a $1.18 billion settlement to address PFAS complaints brought by approximately 300 drinking water providers. Multiple states, airports, firefighter training facilities, and private well owners have also filed lawsuits related to PFAS contamination. These cases are currently pending in the U.S. District Court in Charleston, South Carolina, under the oversight of Judge Richard Gergel, who is managing numerous complaints concerning PFAS damages. The trial for Stuart, Florida’s complaint, which was scheduled for this month, has been postponed to allow further settlement negotiations. Summy noted that the majority of lawsuits stem from the use of PFAS-laden foams in firefighter training exercises at airports, military bases, and other sites across the United States. The 3M settlement is subject to court approval. The company’s website acknowledges its involvement in developing PFAS-containing foams for the U.S. Navy in the 1960s, emphasizing their effectiveness in combating fires caused by jet fuel. 3M maintains that its participation in the settlement does not constitute an admission of liability and is prepared to continue defending itself if the agreement is rejected in court. Summy acknowledged that the cost of removing PFAS from U.S. water systems may eventually exceed the amounts agreed upon in the settlements. However, he believes the settlement will significantly contribute to reducing those costs and eliminate the need for prolonged litigation. Table of Contents Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about water contamination settlementWhat is the settlement amount reached by 3M for water contamination lawsuits?What are PFAS and why are they considered harmful?How will the settlement compensate water providers?What is the timeline for the settlement payment?Is 3M admitting liability by participating in the settlement?Will the settlement completely remove PFAS from drinking water?Are there other companies involved in similar lawsuits?Who is overseeing the lawsuits and settlements?More about water contamination settlement Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about water contamination settlement What is the settlement amount reached by 3M for water contamination lawsuits? 3M has reached a settlement of at least $10.3 billion for lawsuits related to water contamination caused by per- and polyfluorinated substances (PFAS), commonly known as “forever chemicals.” What are PFAS and why are they considered harmful? PFAS, or per- and polyfluorinated substances, are a class of chemicals used in products like firefighting foam, nonstick items, and grease-resistant materials. They are referred to as “forever chemicals” because they do not naturally degrade in the environment. PFAS have been linked to health problems such as liver and immune system damage, as well as certain cancers. How will the settlement compensate water providers? The settlement will compensate water providers for the pollution caused by PFAS contamination in their systems. It aims to cover the costs of filtering PFAS from contaminated systems and conducting necessary testing. What is the timeline for the settlement payment? The settlement payment will be distributed over a span of 13 years, with the possibility of reaching up to $12.5 billion. The final amount will depend on the number of public water systems that detect PFAS during the required testing over the next three years. Is 3M admitting liability by participating in the settlement? No, 3M has stated that its participation in the settlement does not constitute an admission of liability. The company is prepared to defend itself if the agreement is rejected in court. Will the settlement completely remove PFAS from drinking water? While the settlement aims to address the costs of filtering PFAS from contaminated systems, it may not completely eliminate PFAS from all drinking water sources. The long-term goal is to reduce the presence of PFAS and improve public health by implementing stricter regulations and investing in water filtration technology. Are there other companies involved in similar lawsuits? Yes, other companies such as DuPont de Nemours Inc., Chemours Co., and Corteva Inc. have also reached settlements related to PFAS complaints. These lawsuits involve multiple drinking water providers, states, airports, firefighter training facilities, and private well owners. Who is overseeing the lawsuits and settlements? The lawsuits related to PFAS damages are being overseen by Judge Richard Gergel in the U.S. District Court in Charleston, South Carolina. He is managing numerous complaints and ensuring the settlement negotiations proceed accordingly. More about water contamination settlement 3M reaches $10.3 billion settlement over contamination of water systems with ‘forever chemicals’ – The Washington Post PFAS Contamination: What You Need to Know – Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Understanding PFAS – 3M DuPont, Chemours, Corteva agree to $1.18 billion PFAS liability settlement – Reuters Judge overseeing PFAS lawsuits in South Carolina – South Carolina Judicial Department You Might Be Interested In Biden administration announces $600M to produce COVID tests and will reopen website to order them Judge Refuses to Postpone Trial for Trump’s Defamation Lawsuit, Deeming Ex-President’s Appeal Frivolous Takeaways from the scathing report on Minneapolis police after George Floyd’s killing Guardsman in Leaked Docs Case Allegedly Spoke of Violence, Feds Say He May Still Possess Secrets Biden’s Controversial Alaska Oil Project Sparks Tension Among Environmentalists Shocking Attack by Bank Employee Livestreamed in Louisville, Killing 4 3M3M CoBusinessClimate and environmentdrinking water systemsenvironmental pollutionforever chemicalsHealthLawsuitsMinnesotaPFASpublic healthsettlementSt. PaulU.S. Newswater contamination Share 0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail Ryan Lee Follow Author Ryan Lee is a technology journalist who covers the latest trends and developments in the world of tech. He is passionate about new gadgets and software, and he enjoys testing and reviewing the latest products to hit the market. previous post Court Halts Implementation of Wyoming’s Abortion Pill Ban Pending Lawsuit next post After Submersible Tragedy, Investigation into Causes of Fatal Implosion Takes Center Stage You may also like Bookmark A woman who burned Wyoming’s only full-service abortion... December 28, 2023 Bookmark Argument over Christmas gifts turns deadly as 14-year-old... December 28, 2023 Bookmark Pro-Palestinian protesters block airport access roads in New... December 28, 2023 Bookmark Boebert switches congressional districts, avoiding a Democratic opponent... December 28, 2023 Bookmark Boebert Shifts to a Different Congressional District, Dodging... December 28, 2023 Bookmark The Future of Sports Betting Expansion Appears Uncertain... December 27, 2023 Leave a Comment Cancel Reply Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Δ